Cabinet minister Michael Gove has dismissed the prospect of Nicola Sturgeon being granted a second independence referendum - even if her party wins a majority at Holyrood in 2021.
Mr Gove said such a vote would be a "waste of time" and a "distraction", insisting the SNP should instead be focusing on dealing with problems in Scotland's hospitals and improving the education system.
The Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster argued another ballot on the issue should not be allowed to take place as it would contribute to eroding trust in politicians, citing previous pledges from SNP leaders that the 2014 referendum would be a "once in a lifetime event".
Mr Gove's comments came after Alister Jack appeared to suggest an SNP majority in the next Holyrood election could give rise to a mandate.
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn rules out Scottish independence vote before 2021 amid SNP warning
The Scottish Secretary said on Tuesday the "democratic mandate for a Section 30 order", which would permit a legally binding referendum to take place, was a "matter for 2021".
He added: "We'll see whether or not the Scottish National Party get a majority then - and I mean the Scottish National Party, not in collaboration with other parties, not in any alliances, but a Scottish National Party majority."
It comes after Boris Johnson made clear that he will never debate Nicola Sturgeon and will never agree to facilitate a second Scottish independence referendum as long as he is in Downing St.
Now Mr Gove, campaigning with Mr Jack in Dumfries and Galloway on Wednesday, also ruled out any prospect of a second independence vote.
He also suggested that by continuing to push for indyref2, the Scottish First Minister had become the Tories' strongest electoral asset in Scotland.
While polls suggest the Scottish Tories could lose some of the 13 seats they won in 2017, Mr Gove said the party's campaign north of the border was "going very well".
He added: "Our biggest electoral asset of course is Nicola Sturgeon, because Nicola Sturgeon's insistence on a second independence referendum, come hell or high water, is not going down well on the doorstep."
READ MORE: Move towards Scottish independence ‘unstoppable’, warns Ian Blackford
Mr Gove claimed the Scottish First Minister and the SNP would "use any reason, any excuse, any justification to say there should be a second independence referendum", adding if Ms Sturgeon's party was to win a majority at Holyrood in less than two years' time "they will say that is another reason to have a referendum".
But he added: "We're not going to grant that. We will say no, because she said that this was a once in a lifetime event.
"It erodes trust in politics if you say it is a once in a lifetime event and then you go back on that."
Mr Gove, speaking during a visit to a farm outside Castle Douglas, added: "The SNP must justify their record on health, on education, on the economy and in that 2021 election we will be saying not only that we don't want a second independence referendum, that is a total distraction and waste of time, we will also be saying let's have a competent government in Scotland that can make sure that we manage our NHS effectively and improve school standards.
"People are continually asking the question that why is it when you've got a sick kids' hospital in Edinburgh that is ready to open but receiving no patients, when you've got the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow going through such difficult times, when Scottish education is moving backwards, why is she not concentrating on the day job?
"And a vote for the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party is a vote for the only party which is resolutely opposed to another independence referendum, and we're finding strong support for that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel