THE father of London Bridge terror victim Jack Merritt has hit out at politicians, saying his son would be "livid" that his death was being used to further an "agenda of hate".
David Merritt from Cambridgeshire asked for his son’s death not to be used to justify introducing "even more draconian sentences" on offenders in a heartfelt tribute to him.
He tweeted: "Don't use my son's death and his and his colleague's photos to promote your vile propaganda. Jack stood against everything you stand for - hatred, division, ignorance."
In an article for the Guardian Mr Merritt explained his son would be “seething” that his death, and his life, were being used to “perpetuate an agenda of hate he gave his everything fighting against".
He added: "Jack believed in the inherent goodness of humanity and felt a deep social responsibility to protect that. Through us all, Jack marches on."
Yet political reaction to the terror attack did feed into the election campaign as Phillip Lee, the former Tory Justice Minister turned Liberal Democrat, accused Boris Johnson of a "desperate politicisation" of the London Bridge attack and using the “Trump playbook”.
This was denied by Robert Buckland, the Justice Secretary, who stressed: “I do think we need to pause and get the tone of this debate right.”
Meanwhile, police said a second convicted terrorist Nazam Hussain, 34, had been recalled to prison due to a suspected breach of his licence conditions after scores of criminals were vetted following the London Bridge terror attack.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel