A Falklands veteran who said he was forced to leave the Royal Navy because of his sexuality is to have his medal returned to him.
Joe Ousalice said he had a medal for long service and good conduct confiscated when he was discharged after revealing his bisexuality before a court martial in 1993.
He was “treated in a way that would not be acceptable today” and will have the medal returned to him, said a Ministry of Defence spokesman, who also apologised for his treatment.
Read more: Gay men pardoned as new law comes into force
He added: “We accept our policy in respect of serving homosexuals in the military was wrong, discriminatory and unjust to the individuals involved.”
Gay people were not allowed to serve in the military until a rule change in 2000.
Mr Ousalice, who had an 18-year naval career, is a former radio operator who served in the Falklands War and the Middle East, as well as six tours of Northern Ireland.
Read more: Falklands veteran Simon Weston criticises Army drugs readmission policy
He has previously told the BBC that he was forced to live a “double life” while he was in the Navy, and was careful not to associate with other sailors whom he knew were gay.
“I was watching every day what I was saying, what I was doing,” he said.
“After the court martial was completed, a guy came in with a pair of scissors and said ‘Sorry, mate, I need your medal’, and just cut the medal off me.”
At the 1993 hearing he was cleared over accusations that he had had been in bed with another sailor.
Read more: Navy veteran who defended the coast of Norway to finally receive a medal
The MoD said the medal will be returned to Mr Ousalice in person.
It is understood that the MoD is putting in place a scheme to return other medals to veterans who were stripped of them in similar circumstances.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel