Scottish Secretary Alister Jack has said Boris Johnson should not grant the power to hold a second independence referendum, despite the SNP’s General Election gains.
Speaking after he held his Dumfries and Galloway seat with a reduced majority, Mr Jack said he was “delighted” to be re-elected but felt “truly disappointed” for his Scottish Conservative colleagues who had lost out.
He said: “It is a bittersweet night. The sweetness is going back with a majority and not into a hung parliament – I’m delighted about that – but it is sad to be leaving colleagues behind.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Boris Johnson does not have a mandate” to take Scotland out of the EU
Asked if Mr Johnson should grant a section 30 order to enable another vote on Scottish independence, he said: “No, we’ve said it was once-in-a-generation and that generation isn’t past yet, and I would still maintain more people who will have cast votes in Scotland tonight for unionist parties than will have cast votes for the SNP.”
Mr Jack beat SNP challenger Richard Arkless by 1,805 votes, down from the 5,643 majority he had in 2017.
The turnout was 69.1%, with 51,551 votes cast.
READ MORE: General election 2019: How every constituency has voted in Scotland
Meanwhile, Mr Jack’s predecessor as Scottish Secretary, David Mundell, held on to the neighbouring constituency of Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale, but also with a reduced majority.
Mr Mundell was booed by parts of the crowd after using his victory speech to say he “does not regard tonight’s vote as any change to the mandate for having another independence referendum”.
His 2017 majority of 9,441 fell to 3,781, on a turnout of 72.1% with a total of 49,295 votes cast.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel