The Scottish Parliament has been urged to reject the UK Government’s Withdrawal Agreement.
MSPs are set to debate whether to give consent to the agreement struck by Prime Minister Boris Johnson with the EU.
Legislative consent for issues affecting devolved policy areas is required under the devolution agreement but, in practice, the UK Government could still proceed against the will of the Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish administrations.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson renews push to get his Brexit deal through Parliament
The Scottish Government’s Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell said: “We have a duty to explicitly reject consent to this Bill in order to respect the clear and consistent majority opposition to Scotland leaving the EU.
“England and Wales voted to leave and Northern Ireland will have its own arrangements, Scotland voted Remain but within the month will be forced to leave, with no say over its future relationship with the European Union.”
Mr Russell added the Withdrawal Agreement also increases the chances of a no-deal Brexit, whereby the UK fails to negotiate a trade deal before leaving the EU.
READ MORE: Foreign property investors poised to swoop on Scotland
“There is also no doubt that this Bill puts a calamitous no-deal scenario firmly back on the table,” he said.
“Imposing an arbitrary deadline, the end of 2020, to conclude a free trade agreement with the European Union is unrealistic and does nothing but increase the risk of a no-deal scenario once again.”
A UK Government spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has delivered a great deal that works for the whole of the UK, giving us the certainty we need to leave the EU and move on together. We want 2020 to be a year of opportunity, growth and unity, not further political division.
“It is disappointing the Scottish Government has so far refused to recommend legislative consent and are instead undermining this process to signal their opposition to Brexit.
“We have worked with them throughout the Brexit process and we will continue to do so.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel