Scottish Secretary Alister Jack has dismissed claims by SNP ministers that they have secured a mandate for a second referendum on independence.
At talks in London, Scottish Constitutional Relations Secretary Mike Russell said the party had gained the right for fresh vote after winning 47 of the 59 Scottish seats in last month's general election.
But Mr Jack said the SNP's share of the popular vote was no higher than it was at the time of the 2014 independence referendum.
READ MORE: Glasgow independence rally cancelled due to weather - but march still going ahead
"We believe that the 45% of the people who voted for the SNP was a similar number who voted for independence in 2014," he told reporters following the meeting.
"Our view is that 55% of Scotland voted for unionist parties and therefore they don't have a mandate."
Mr Jack said the UK Government would be making a "measured and considered" response to a formal request by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon to hold a referendum under section 30 of the Scotland Act.
He insisted it was right the power to consent to a referendum remained at Westminster, otherwise Scotland would face a series of "never-endums" as the SNP sought the result it wanted.
"Once they could do that, they could just keep asking and create constitutional uncertainty, it would create economic uncertainty. It is damaging to jobs, damaging to taxation," he said.
The clash came at the first meeting of the Joint Ministerial Council (JMC) on EU negotiations since the general election.
It was attended by representatives of the UK and Scottish Governments, as well as the Welsh administration.
Following the talks, Mr Russell said they could not make progress on other issues until the referendum issue was resolved.
READ MORE: Scottish Labour considering U-turn on second independence vote
"We have a mandate to have a referendum in Scotland - there is no doubt about that," he told reporters.
"I accept that the UK Government has a mandate to leave the EU. They have to accept our mandate.
"Until that issue is resolved it is very difficult to make progress on anything else. It will colour everything in this process from now on."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel