Labour leadership candidate Jess Phillips has said she felt “quite tempted” to quit the party over its handling of allegations of anti-Semitism.
The Birmingham Yardley MP said she “wobbled the most” when she saw a BBC Panorama investigation which claimed senior figures in the party had interfered in anti-Semitism investigations.
Mrs Phillips said Jewish former Labour MP Luciana Berger’s decision to quit the party over anti-Semitism last year shook her “very, very deeply”.
Asked during a phone-in on LBC radio how tempted she was to follow Ms Berger, she said: “On many occasions I felt quite tempted…
“It was the episode of Panorama where I wobbled the most and felt not only was our movement intolerant of the Jewish community but also those brave staff – Jewish or otherwise – had been bullied and harassed and I just thought this is unrecognisable to me as the party.”
READ MORE: Jess Phillips outlines opposition to second Scottish independence vote
She said if she had not stayed she “would have just been replaced by somebody who might not have spoken up”.
“You have to focus on the outcome, you have to focus on what you want to see changed.
“Now I could change nothing from the outside and those that walked away, incredibly courageously, it felt for those of us that stayed that it barely moved the dial. And so I stayed.”
Over the weekend, the MP suspended a member of her team for “completely unacceptable” tweets about Israel.
Mrs Phillips said if she failed in her bid to replace Jeremy Corbyn, she would like to serve under her rival Lisa Nandy, the MP for Wigan.
“I think that we need a woman leader of the Labour Party so I’m going to say Lisa Nandy.”
READ MORE: Kirsty Strickland: If It’s a question of leadership, Jess Phillips isn’t the answer
She also said Edinburgh South MP Ian Murray has one of the “most credible cases” to be deputy leader, and that she would not vote for shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon.
“But I wouldn’t rule anybody out,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel