Labour deputy leadership hopeful Ian Murray said he does not want to see an independent Scottish version of the party.
Currently, the Scottish and UK Labour parties are linked, but Mr Murray claims the party north of the border has the most autonomy of any UK iteration of Labour.
His comments come just a few days after Scottish Labour leader Richard Leonard told the PA news agency it would be his party which would make the decision on their final position on Scottish independence.
Speaking on the BBC’s Andrew Marr Show on Sunday, Mr Murray – the only Labour MP in Scotland – was asked if he believes the party should be responsible for its entire policy position, to which he replied: “Absolutely no.”
He added: “We’re a UK party and I think we have to act as a UK party.
“What I would do is make sure that the parties have all the autonomy they require.
“The Scottish Labour Party actually has more autonomy than any other part of the UK Labour Party, but it isn’t used.
“Let’s use that autonomy, and that takes away any issues around becoming a separate party.”
The candidate added that general secretaries of the party’s regional groups need power to make decisions in a bid to ensure last month’s election is not repeated, adding: “Never again should we go into a general election campaign where it’s run by London and others around the country are screaming out for resources and targeting.
READ MORE: Alistair Grant: Scotland's endless Indyref2 Groundhog Day is going nowhere fast
“We shouldn’t be having seats lost by several hundred (votes) when there are thousands of activists in seats we’ll never win.”
Mr Murray also said Labour would have to “re-connect” with regions across the UK, including Scotland, to ensure a return to power for the party.
He said: “One of the lessons of the 2019 general election, not just in Scotland but across the rest of the UK, is the public didn’t see the Labour Party as being credible.
“We have to talk to those communities again, and that’s one of the major planks of my proposal to be deputy leader of the party.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel