POPULAR bathroom toiletries are often failing to give proper recycling details on the packaging, severely hampering the war on waste, a leading watchdog has claimed.
The consumer group Which? is now warning that a mountain of packaging is heading to landfill when it could actually be recycled.
The organisation looked at the recycling information on the labels of 20 common toiletries, as well as the type and volume of packaging, to determine how clearly the products are labelled and how difficult they would be to recycle.
It found that 12 out of 20 (60%) products had no recycling information on the label, despite most of them being partially or wholly recyclable. Only six of the products (30%) that Which? examined seemed to be getting the labelling right – advising consumers that the products should be recycled and with specific instructions on how to do so.
The consumer group is worried the lack of clear and understandable labelling could cause confusion among consumers and lead to significant numbers of recyclable products being sent to rubbish tips.
Natalie Hitchins, Which? head of home products and services, said: “Recycling and sustainability are a high priority for many consumers – so the lack of clear information on the products we looked at is inexcusable in this day and age.
“With the packaging of many recyclable bathroom toiletries going into landfill in the UK, brands must take action to ensure bottles of shampoo, conditioner and shower gel are clearly labelled and can be disposed of in an efficient way.”
Which? found that while two-thirds (67%) of people think recyclability of packaging is important when supermarket shopping, a majority (65%) of Which? members said they were not cutting back on plastics in the bathroom.
One-third (33%) said this was because it would be too difficult to replace bathroom products they regularly use, while one-quarter (23%) hadn’t thought about it before. One in six (16%) explained that they don’t know how to cut back on bathroom plastic.
The testers found that Head & Shoulders classic clean shampoo (500ml), L’Oreal Elvive Colour Protect conditioner (400ml) and Listerine Total Care mouthwash (500ml) had no clear labelling regarding recycling, despite being made of recyclable materials.
While many brands fell short of the standards Which? expected, Carex’s Complete Original handwash (250ml) displays clear labelling about how to recycle the bottle, and encourages people to do so. Radox Feel Refreshed shower gel (250ml) gives similarly clear instructions.
For most people, the recycling habit has taken hold more effectively with groceries and other kitchen products. Previous Which? research found that on average 58% of packaging for grocery products was clearly labelled.
The organisation is concerned that many toiletry brands are not doing enough to offer consumers clear information about whether or not their bathroom products are recyclable.
It said the onus is now on these brands to make significant changes to the way they approach the production of plastic packaging and how they communicate with their customers.
Which? is also calling on the Government to make recycling labelling simple, clear and mandatory, and ensure the necessary infrastructure is in place to make it easy for everyone to recycle, regardless of where they live.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel