BORIS Johnson is under mounting pressure to sack a new No 10 aide and rein in his controversial chief strategist Dominic Cummings after a row over eugenics and race engulfed Downing St.
No 10 was told to “get a grip” by Nicola Sturgeon and its approach was branded “disgusting” by Labour’s Ian Lavery after it intensified the controversy by refusing to clarify if the Prime Minister agreed with Andrew Sabisky’s “appalling” views, including a suggestion that black people were less intelligent than white people.
Bell Ribiero-Addy, the Labour MP for Streatham, tweeted: “You don’t have to believe black people have lower IQs than white people to get a job at @10DowningStreet. But it helps.”
Tory backbencher Caroline Noakes, a former Immigration Minister, who now chairs the Commons Women and Equalities Committee, also took to social media, saying: “Cannot believe No 10 has refused to comment on Andrew Sabisky. I don’t know him from a bar of soap but don’t think we’d get on…Must be no place in Government for the views he’s expressed.”
Commenting on Mr Sabisky, one Government adviser told BuzzFeed News: “Hiring this imbecile is an insult to those who came before, which is a minor point I know but, Jesus wept, it makes me ashamed.”
Pressed repeatedly on the views expressed by the 27-year-old researcher and whether the PM agreed with them and if he condemned them, Mr Johnson’s spokesman simply said the PM’s “views are well-documented” and declined to comment on “individual appointments”.
Mr Sabisky was drafted in to No 10 after Mr Cummings called for “misfits and weirdos” to apply to advise the Conservative Government.
He is reported to have said -
*Black Americans have a lower average IQ than white Americans and were more likely to have an “intellectual disability”.
*”One way to get around the problems of unplanned pregnancies creating a permanent underclass would be to legally enforce universal uptake of long-term contraception at the onset of puberty. Vaccination laws give it a precedent, I would argue.”
*“I am always straight up in saying that women’s sport is more comparable to the Paralympics than it is to men’s.”
*The benefits of a purported cognitive enhancer, which can prove fatal, were “probably worth a dead kid once a year”.
The First Minister tweeted: “These are really not acceptable headlines for any government to be generating [or allowing to be generated]. They need to get a grip fast and demonstrate some basic but fundamental values in the terms of our public debate.”
Mr Lavery, the Labour Chairman, said: “It is disgusting that not only has No 10 failed to condemn Andrew Sabisky’s appalling comments but also seems to have endorsed the idea that white people are more intelligent than black people.”
Ed Davey for the Liberal Democrats said: “When you have a Prime Minister who has referred to people as ‘picaninnies’ with ‘watermelon smiles’, it is sadly no surprise that Boris Johnson has signed off on Dominic Cummings recruiting someone with such extreme and offensive views.”
He added: “The Prime Minister must do the right thing and put an end to the offence caused and sack Andrew Sabisky. He must also make crystal clear why he signed off on this appointment and curb Dominic Cummings’s power to appoint and sack at will.”
An SNP spokesman said: “Boris Johnson must immediately condemn these remarks, remove this individual, and make clear immediately that they do not represent the views of his government.
“Communities across the country will rightly be concerned about who Boris Johnson has in his inner circle at the very heart of Downing Street, and how individuals with such abhorrent views are hired.
“Johnson has serious questions to answer and he can begin by setting out why his government has refused to sack an advisor who holds such discriminatory, misogynistic, and racist views?” he added.
Eugenics is the study of or belief in the possibility that the qualities of human beings can be improved by either discouraging people from having babies who are deemed to have genetic defects or undesirable inheritable traits or encouraging others to have babies who are deemed to have desirable inheritable traits.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel