Brussels said the Withdrawal Agreement must be effectively implemented – and cautioned that respecting legal obligations would be “very important” for establishing trust between the UK and EU in future negotiations.
Dana Spinant, deputy chief spokeswoman of the European Commission, told reporters at a briefing: “The Withdrawal Agreement has been signed and ratified by both sides and as such it must be effectively implemented.
“That includes, of course, the protocol on Northern Ireland and all its constituent parts.
“Of course, in this context as in all others, we would expect our partners to respect their international obligations under their national law and under international law – that includes, of course, the Withdrawal Agreement which has legal force.
“Obviously, with respect to the future and how this plays in the negotiation, of course respecting our legal obligations is very important for establishing trust between two partners in a negotiation.”
Downing Street insisted the UK would “comply with our obligations” under the deal struck with Brussels and said it would require only “limited changes” to Great Britain-Northern Ireland trade.
“The protocol specifically allows the UK to ensure unfettered market access for goods moving from Northern Ireland to GB,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.
“The UK signed the Withdrawal Agreement including the protocol last month, we will comply with our obligations.”
The spokesman added that Boris Johnson “has been clear that beyond the limited changes which are introduced by the protocol, there will be no changes to GB/NI trade”.
“We have not asked any ports to prepare for new checks or controls between GB/NI.”
Downing Street rejected the suggestion from France that the December 31 deadline for a trade deal was an attempt to “blackmail” the European Union into striking a deal at all costs by that date.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “The UK’s primary objective in the negotiations is to ensure that we restore our economic and political independence on January 1 2021.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here