Tit-for-tat tariffs resulting from a US-EU trade dispute on goods including Scotch whisky and US bourbon should be removed to show "good will" as the UK seeks a trade deal with America.
Last week it emerged that American's 25% tariffs imposed on EU goods, including single malt Scotch whisky, is to stay in place.
The Scotch Whisky Association had urged the UK and US Governments to hold talks, to try to resolve the dispute.
The industry has warned that Scotch whisky exports are facing a £100 million loss this year if the US continues to impose its tariffs on the product.
International Trade Secretary Liz Truss told MPs she pressed US trade representative Robert Lighthizer last week for an "urgent settlement" ahead of trade talks.
The World Trade Organisation last year gave the US the green light to impose tariffs on up to 7.5 billion dollars (£6.1 billion) of goods from the European Union as retaliation for illegal subsidies the bloc gave to plane-maker Airbus, and these tariffs will include Scotch whisky.
READ MORE: Trump tariffs delay Scotch distiller's US expansion
The EU hit back by placing tariffs on US goods, including bourbon whiskey.
Former Scotland secretary David Mundell said the 25% duty applied to Scotch whisky was a "cloud on the horizon" of any UK-US trade talks.
He added: "What confidence can the secretary of state give us that at the end of this process we'll see no duties on Scotch whisky of any kind in the United States and no duty on on bourbon in the United Kingdom?"
In response, Ms Truss said: "This is a major issue for our excellent Scotch whisky producers and also other producers such as Walkers Shortbread and cashmere producers as well.
"I raised this issue again with (US trade representative) Lighthizer again when I saw him last week.
"I want to see an urgent settlement of the Airbus-Boeing dispute so we can remove these retaliatory tariffs on things like bourbon, Harley-Davidsons and Florida orange juice as well as our excellent products here in the UK.
READ MORE: Scotch whisky industry says it faces £100m loss this year if US tariffs continue
"And I am urging as an early part of these trade negotiations removal of existing tariffs to show good will towards the negotiations."
In 2018, Brussels imposed a 25 per cent tariff on imports of US whiskey into the EU in response to American tariffs on European steel and aluminium. A year later, the US retaliated, imposing a 25 per cent tariff on imports of single malt Scotch whisky in the long-running dispute over EU and American subsidies to Airbus and Boeing.
Scotch and American whiskies had traded tariff-free across the Atlantic for over 25 years.
Former international trade secretary Liam Fox said UK exports to the US currently attract £500 million in tariffs.
He added: "The removal of which would be an immediate boost to the UK economy.
"But that the opportunity's even greater because we're currently involved in retaliatory tariffs as a result of the EU-US steel dispute and we are subject to tariffs that the US never wanted to apply to the UK.
"And as we separate ourselves from the European Union we can remove ourselves from the ensnarement of that which will enable us to remove many other tariffs which will beneficial to consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel