BILLY BROWN has predicted a backlash from bosses against ‘unfair’ plans to potentially cancel the Scottish football season and honour current league positions.
The former Hearts and Hibs assistant, who now serves as chairman of the League Managers Association [LMA], plans to hold talks with coaches at all levels of the game in the coming week amid the current shut-down.
However, he has balked at the idea of calling off the campaign with immediate effect and dishing out trophies, promotions and – potentially most damaging of all – relegations based on the standings as of March 13.
And he has urged those in the corridors of power to canvass the opinions of managers, insisting they are too-often ignored.
The 2019/20 calendar could be scrapped in the face of the coronavirus outbreak, in which case Celtic being declared champions and Dundee United, Raith Rovers and Cove Rangers winning promotion. Hearts, Partick Thistle and Stranraer would be relegated.
Brown said: “My opinion is that would be unfair and I would have thought the majority of managers would be against that plan. I think it will be an unpopular idea – and the wrong decision.
“The season needs to be finished. Granted, Celtic are going to win the league, but Hearts are only four points adrift with eight games left. This isn’t a personal thing because I worked there, but how can you relegate a team who could have survived?
“Dundee United are likely to win promotion, but what about the teams below them still vying for promotion? And all the teams that would have real financial problems if they are relegated?
“I don’t blame, for example, Neil Lennon calling for Celtic to get the title. But they’ll win it regardless and there are a lot of other issues to be taken into consideration. Do we kick Brechin [bottom of League 2] out of the SPFL and threaten their survival?
“I’ll be talking to managers over the coming week and the consensus will become clearer. In general, there should be more clarity next week. But the opinion of the managers should be considered, and they often aren’t.”
Brown accepts that there is no easy solution to an unprecedented crisis but believes honouring the campaign with fixtures being played behind closed doors is the lesser of the evils.
Brown continued: “My view is the season should be completed behind closed doors. It’s not what football should be about, you need a crowd atmosphere – but I think it remains our best solution.
“This limbo could go on for months and months so we should try to get the games played. There are things you could do; stream the games through Club TV channels, ensure matches are televised, and try to mitigate the lack of folk in the stadium.”
The players’ union PFA Scotland have expressed concerns about their members undertaking a physical, contact sport as the illness spreads – but Brown is adamant that, with the right precautions, that could still be viable.
There have been, as yet, no confirmed cases of Covid-19 among SPFL clubs.
Brown responded: “If there are any players who are showing symptoms, then they obviously wouldn’t take part. But if everyone is cleared then we should try to complete the calendar.
“Testing would need to be done very regularly within the clubs but I’d like to think that could be organised quite easily.”
Regardless of what decision is reached, Brown believes the LMA members are facing unprecedented challenges, from planning training sessions, deciding whether to give players time off, to navigating contract talks and attempting to build a squad for next term.
He added: “It’s a hugely difficult situation. They will all have different ideas about when they should train, where the players should go, how to stay sharp. Aberdeen and Hibs have given players time off, whereas Hearts and Livingston haven’t.
“There’s no right answer because this is all unprecedented.
“Ordinarily, managers would be considering whether to offer contracts, sign players and general planning for next season but that forward planning is on hold. There’s so much uncertainty and, in many ways, the managers are the ones in the middle of it.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here