TAXPAYERS will fork out at least £156 million due to the collapse of Thomas Cook, a report by the Whitehall spending watchdog has found.
The National Audit Office said the Department for Transport (DfT) has agreed to pay an estimated £83 million towards the total cost of repatriating the travel giant’s customers who were not covered by the Atol scheme.
Other Government costs include £58 million in redundancy and related payments to Thomas Cook’s former employees, and at least £15 million for liquidating the business.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: Airports will close ‘within weeks’ without Government support
The NAO added that “the final cost may not be known for some time”, partly due to invoices for repatriation costs still being received.
Labour MP Meg Hillier, who chairs the Commons’ Public Accounts Committee (PAC), said “lessons need to be learnt and future risks understood”.
She went on: “The repatriation looks set to cost the taxpayer £83 million and there are other costs associated with insolvency of at least £73 million.
“Government looks set to foot the bill, with industry off the hook. The resources to cover other airlines going bust is now very limited. New regulations are urgently required.”
When Thomas Cook collapsed on September 23 last year, the DfT instructed the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) to repatriate all 150,000 holidaymakers who were overseas.
This included the roughly 83,000 who had not booked a trip with Atol protection, which meant they were not automatically entitled to be flown home free of charge.
The DfT is reimbursing the cost of repatriating those passengers.
Thomas Cook previously secured a £900m rescue deal led by its largest shareholder Chinese firm Fosun in August but was plunged into further jeopardy when the firm’s lenders demanded a further £200m in contingency funding.
The firm asked the UK Government for financial aid but Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab said the government did not “systematically step in” when businesses went under unless there was “a good strategic national interest”.
It said at the time that it decided to intervene based on its assessment that Thomas Cook customers were at risk of significant disruption and cost to return to the UK.
A total of 746 flights from 54 airports were involved in what was known as Operation Matterhorn.
READ MORE: Coronavirus: British Airways and Aer Lingus update customers after US travel ban
The NAO report warned there could be further costs to taxpayers if another large travel company collapses in the near future.
That is because the Government has agreed to stand behind the fund that covers Atol-protected passengers if it runs out of money.
The CAA told the NAO that the exposure to the fund of the Thomas Cook repatriation and refunds will be £481 million and “there will be relatively limited resources left” once all costs have been met.
In December, the Government announced plans for new airline insolvency legislation, which would allow carriers to keep their planes flying long enough to repatriate passengers.
The collapse of Thomas Cook led to 9,000 jobs being lost, with many ex-workers still unemployed.
The Government was accused of not doing enough to help what was the world’s oldest travel company.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel