A "huge amount of clarification" is needed on tougher rules to restrict people's movements during the coronavirus crisis, a former police chief has said.
Last night, Boris Johnson made clear the social lockdown would be enforced by police, threatening those who flouted the rules with fines.
Officers will have powers to disperse gatherings after a ban on meetings of more than two people apart from those who live together was announced.
But questions remain as to how officers will monitor whether people are breaking the rules, what action will then be taken, and how much the fines will be.
Sir Peter Fahy, former chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, told BBC Breakfast: "There is a huge amount of clarification needed."
Police chiefs warned of phone lines being inundated with calls after Mr Johnson's statement, with questions about what movements are still permitted.
Nick Adderley, the Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police, urged the public not to "cripple our phone" lines with inquiries on the PM's announcement.
Lincolnshire Police warned of an "extremely high volume" of calls, and Lee Freeman, the police chief on Humberside, said his force had received "a number of calls" on the subject but admitted he was unable to answer the questions asked.
Sir Peter said: "There is no way, really, that the police can enforce this using powers; it has got to be because the public hugely support it, that there is peer pressure and there is continuing clarification from Government about the message and going through all the individual scenarios and questions that people will have about what happens in this situation.
"It feels like, in the next few days, we will need an implementation period, but the key thing is that the public accept that this is absolutely vital if lives are to be saved."
The former police chief warned forces were "already very stretched" and questions would arise about whether officers have powers of arrest if they are tasked with dispersing groups of people, adding: "So, really, there is no way that this can be achieved through enforcement alone.
"It will have to be that the public hugely accept it and the Government continues to issue clarification and reinforces the message.
"We don't really want 43 separate police forces in England and Wales interpreting this in different ways and individual officers being faced with real dilemmas about whether to allow this or not to allow it."
Asked how social distancing rules would be enforced by police, Martin Hewitt, Chairman of the National Police Chiefs' Council, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme, that, while laws were still being put in place, this was an "opportunity" for police to speak to people to urge them to go back home but added: "Ultimately, if people do refuse to abide by the rules then we will need to enforce them."
However, he said the legislation has not been enacted yet.
Asked whether it was the police's role to be at railway stations to check if people should be getting on to trains, he said: "I don't think we're at that stage at the moment. The real point about that is really getting the clarity, I know some other people have said that this morning.
"These are new rules, they are trying to be as clear as they can, but it will take a while for everybody to get that understanding."
Ken Marsh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents officers in London, told Sky News the new measures would be a "real challenge" and "very difficult".
He added: "We will be dealing with it but I'm not sure we will have the resources to be able to see it through."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel