So far 1,228 people in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus have died, according to the latest figures from the Department of Health and Social Care.
The number, which was published on March 29 and is correct as of 5pm on March 28, is the only official statistic available for the whole of the country.
It is updated every 24 hours and allows us to see the day-on-day change in the total deaths reported so far, as well as whether the rate is increasing or slowing down.
But it does not give us a real-time snapshot of the number of coronavirus-related deaths in the UK, nor is it an accurate reflection of exactly where we are in the “curve” of the outbreak.
There a number of reasons for this.
First, the numbers that are published each day include deaths that have occurred over a range of dates – usually over the previous few days, but sometimes from weeks earlier.
The list of deaths announced by NHS England in its bulletin of March 29 included deaths that were recorded as taking place as far back as March 16.
A death is only included in the figures once families of the victim have been informed.
So the day-on-day change in the official death figures is not moving in step with how many coronavirus-related deaths are taking place in real time.
Secondly, deaths being included in the official total are focused on those that have taken place in hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
These provide the most immediate sources of data for the Department of Health, and which are then used for the daily updates.
NHS England, for instance, publishes a daily breakdown of coronavirus-related deaths in England by NHS Trust.
Deaths that have occurred in the wider community are not included.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes weekly provisional figures on the total number of deaths registered in England and Wales, including the wider community, as well as whether the underlying cause of death is a respiratory disease.
But there is a lag in these figures of about 11 days – the latest ONS bulletin, published on March 24, had numbers up to the week ending March 13.
These figures are also based on when a death is registered, not when it occurred.
A third reason the official death figures do not give a real-time snapshot of where we are in the “curve” of the outbreak is due to the amount of time that can pass between somebody contracting the virus and them losing their life through a coronavirus-related death.
This means that any steps taken to limit the spread of the virus, such as social distancing or lockdowns, take time to show up in the number of deaths.
A study published in The Lancet on March 12 based on data reported in Wuhan, China, found that the median average time from the onset of coronavirus symptoms to admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is about 10 days.
A separate study by the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, based on cases in England, Wales and Northern Ireland up to March 26, found that of a sample of 165 patients treated in ICUs where an outcome was reported, 79 (48%) had died and 86 (52%) had been discharged.
Those who had died had spent a median average of four days in an ICU from admission to death.
These factors – the onset of symptoms and the time it takes for a patient to die while in hospital – adds further to the lag in the death statistics.
And it means that we are likely to have to wait at least a couple of weeks to get a clear idea of whether the recent measures introduced in the UK to “flatten the curve” of virus-related deaths have had an impact.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here