COMMENTS SUSPENDED OWING TO PERSISTENT ABUSE
Scotland yesterday set out its fullest public account of mass historic child abuse.
An independent report for the Scottish Government gave an official voice to the men and women who, as children, were sexually, physically and emotionally tortured over nearly half a century.
Its author, Tom Shaw, found widespread systemic failures in the nation's confused and confusing network of children's homes and residential schools run by the state, charities and churches.
In his recommendations, Mr Shaw said survivors of abuse should get a national support centre alongside a new nationwide task force to stand up for youngsters currently in care.
The national task group, he said, would oversee all such services in the future and try to stand up for children who, he warned, are still "out of sight and out of mind".
He said: "I'm deeply concerned about the possibility of people who were not listened to as children not being listened to as adults."
Their stories, he said, should be recorded in a special centre for the victims of abuse in children's homes. He did his best in his own report, Historical Abuse Systemic Review, and included first-hand accounts of children's experiences in homes.
The report was not the full-fledged public inquiry campaigners had wanted. It was the idea of the old Scottish Executive, through First Minister Jack McConnell who officially apologised to victims of what he called Scotland's "national shame" in 2004. Mr Shaw, appointed in 2005, was working to a tight remit, focusing on the rules governing children in care between 1950 and 1995. He acknowledged that his work would not go far enough to satisfy campaigners, many of whom gathered to hear his recommendations. His report does not name individual abusers - or even the institutions where abuse took place.
The Scottish Government welcomed the report yesterday, without giving much away about future plans. Adam Ingram, the Children's Minister, said he was "in full agreement of the principles of the findings and the recommendations". The report was "far-reaching" and "it is right that we give detailed and serious consideration to the issues".
Mr Ingram has already announced an inquiry into allegations - and convictions - for child abuse at Kerelaw, the residential school and secure unit in Ayrshire that sparked Scotland's biggest child abuse investigation before it closed in 2005.
Kerelaw, however, was just the latest in a succession of abuse scandals in residential institutions for children. The list has grown in recent years. It includes: Larchgrove, a council-run children's home in Glasgow; Blairs College, a seminary in Aberdeen; St Ninian's, a school run by the De La Salle Brothers, monks in Gartmore, Stirlingshire; and Nazareth House, a chain of Catholic children's homes.
Mr Shaw warned that serious problems still remain within residential childcare, not least the low level of training among care workers. He was unable even to begin to measure the scale of abuse in Scottish care homes. That would only emerge from a major judicial investigation. At least one support group for survivors believes that is exactly what Scotland needs now.
David Whelan, of Former Boys and Girls Abused of Quarriers Homes, said: "We are still pushing for a full public inquiry, specifically into Quarriers. It's a special case."
Mr Whelan's group represents 100 former residents of the Quarriers village in Bridge of Weir. Some would like to see the charity change its name. Others want it to apologise.
Quarriers yesterday backed Mr Shaw's recommendations.
Phil Robinson, its chief executive, said: "When Quarriers provided evidence to the Scottish parliamentary debate on historic abuse, we stated that our position is that if any individual suffered abuse at Quarriers then we apologise. This also led to the public apology made by then First Minister Jack McConnell to survivors of historic abuse".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article