By Alastair Davis
WHATEVER shape Scotland’s economic recovery takes, one thing is for certain. As public spending is squeezed, unemployment rises and financial hardship increases, our most disadvantaged communities will be hardest hit. In this context, demand for community, wellbeing and people-centred services - the types of services which are typically provided by the third sector and social enterprises – will be greater than ever.
Given this impending crisis, it was good to see the Scottish Government’s recent Economic Recovery report placing Scotland’s third sector at the heart of planning for recovery and renewal, recognising its critical contribution to the goal of a wellbeing economy in Scotland. While it didn’t specifically mention social enterprises, we would argue that they are absolutely central to the third sector’s capabilities.
In acknowledging the state’s reduced ability to meet society’s needs, the report envisages a crucial role for this sector in providing a level of community resilience, supporting young people, employability, health and wellbeing. And yet, importantly, it also correctly highlights that without further investment and support, the third sector and the many crucial services supporting some of our most disadvantaged communities might not survive.
Given the need to attract further investment, the potential scrapping of one of the very tools designed to encourage more capital flow into these communities couldn’t have come at a worse time.
Social Investment Tax Relief (SITR) was introduced in 2014 as means of making it easier for community interest companies, community benefit societies and charities to raise finance.
The scheme offers tax relief on investments in businesses which meet the criteria, with the aim of unlocking and connecting private capital with communities.
In fairness to its doubters, the scheme has had its issues. However, those issues are not insurmountable. And while the scheme is by no means perfect, it’s currently the only tax break specifically aimed at social enterprises.
Across the UK, SITR has already leveraged at least £14 million in private investment to help more than 75 social enterprises deliver essential services. The figures for Scotland are obviously much lower, but it has still made a meaningful impact during its short existence.
SITR enabled Social Investment Scotland to create SIS Community Capital, a pioneering social investment fund which raised £400,000 entirely from private investors, to support seven social enterprises based in Scotland, which are all making significant social and environmental impacts within their local communities. SITR was also used to help set up the inaugural profit with purpose fund for SIS Ventures, raising £1.3m of private capital to invest in impactful enterprises.
As things stand, SITR will come to its conclusion in April 2021. Standing alongside the social enterprise community and our partners including Big Society Capital, SIS is calling upon the UK Government to extend accessibility to SITR for a further two years as part of an amendment to the Financial Bill passing through parliament.
Such an extension would allow time to make any necessary reforms and create a scheme which is future-fit and able continue directing private money to disadvantaged places and causes. In fact, Big Society Capital has estimated that SITR has the potential to generate at least £300 million in investment over seven years if reformed.
To scrap the scheme at this stage would send entirely the wrong signal about support for a sector which, if appropriately financed, could play a significant role in Scotland’s recovery and renewal.
Alastair Davis is CEO, Social Investment Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here