By Laura Alexander
STUDENTS and school pupils across Scotland have had to come to terms with abruptly switching to studying online. A recent study by The Open University highlighted that suddenly being expected to study entirely on-screen is a much bigger handicap than many people assume. This effect may be just as large, if not larger, for young people, our so-called “digital natives”.
Understanding this is key for educators and policy advisors developing new models of learning delivery around Covid-19. The importance of ensuring students studying remotely have access to printed material and support to develop online study skills should not be underestimated.
Evidence indicates that students do not approach studying on a screen in the same way they would studying on paper. Particularly for non-narrative text, our brains have learnt not to expect on-screen content to require in-depth processing, and so we don’t engage with it as we would the same content on paper.
It may be surprising to some that “digital natives” are not necessarily better at reading on-screen. Despite increased screen exposure and experience, data from multiple studies shows the advantage of paper-based reading over on-screen reading is actually increasing over time.
There is also little indication that younger students prefer to read on screen. In a study of over 500 students at an American university, over 80% chose to use traditional print textbooks rather than e-books. At the end of the module almost half of those who had chosen e-books said they would not choose an e-book in future. This was reflected in our research, with the number of students preferring to study on paper rather than on screen being around 80%, with no significant differences by age.
But what if students have no option but to study on screen? One way to significantly improve reader retention is to avoid scrolling, ie each page should fit on a single screen, supplied in a “reflowable” format, so it reformats itself to suit the device it is being viewed on. Note-taking is key to ensuring comprehension of material studied on-screen, involving paraphrasing and organising material. Using tablets and e-readers to have the screen at a similar angle to a book has also been shown to reduce eyestrain and headaches, as has avoiding the need for scrolling.
The evidence is that suddenly moving to entirely on-screen study in academic subjects will have an impact on pupil learning, with a particularly large effect in the first year a student has to do this – not good news for pupils with exams this year! At The Open University our Stage-1 courses are designed to teach appropriate study skills, and students’ stage-1 study does not affect their final degree classification, giving them time to learn how to study onscreen content.
It’s important to recognise that what is happening now is an emergency response, where everyone in the sector is making a remarkable effort to switch to online teaching, but we should accept that young people are being disadvantaged. Any longer-term provision needs to be carefully planned to ensure the right pedagogical approaches, teaching strategies, quality study materials and infrastructure.
With over 50 years of online teaching experience, The Open University is offering advice to primary and secondary schools, indeed all educational providers, as to how to develop their distance learning offer, with a number of new OU resources that focus on pivoting to online teaching.
Laura Alexander is a Senior Lecturer at The Open University in Scotland
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel