A FORMER SNP cabinet minister has warned his party risks alienating its working class base by ignoring pleas for another independence referendum and prioritising gender politics.

Kenny MacAskill, the former justice secretary and current MP for East Lothian, warned not to treat traditional supporters “with contempt” or look down on them as “the Great Unwoke”.

He said: “We forget our roots and ignore our base at our peril.”

Mr MacAskill also criticised Nicola Sturgeon yesterday for failing to work out how to secure Indyref2 in the face of Boris Johnson refusing to grant Holyrood the required power.

READ MORE: Letters: SNP must end the division of independence as new crisis looms

“It’s surprising to say the least that the SNP leadership hasn’t sought to test the legal waters on holding their own,” he said in his Scotsman column.

Mr MacAskill has become an increasingly outspoken critic of the current SNP hierarchy since leaving the cabinet in 2014 when Alex Salmond quit as First Minister.

Writing in today’s new issue of the Scottish Left Review, he holds up the example of Democrats losing power to the Republicans in rural America as a cautionary lesson for the SNP.

“It’s never wise to forget your electoral base, or worse to treat it with contempt,” he said.

“Of course, America’s not just far away but a vastly different society and economy. But there’s still lessons for us here that we’d be wise to heed.

“For Kansas may now be red-neck Republican but it wasn’t always and that’s happened not just because of targeting by the alt-right but tragically through policies and attitudes of the Democratic leadership. We forget our roots and ignore our base at our peril.”

He said President Bill Clinton and Labour PM Tony Blair both tried to “triangulate” policies to capture the centre ground, but drifted to the Right and lost touch with their parties’ roots.

Their previous supporters “felt mocked and derided for their views” by a metropolitan elite, a dislocation that eventually led in the UK to Brexit and Labour’s collapse in Norther England.

Turning to Scotland, and referring to the SNP’s internal splits over transgender rights, Mr MacAskill said: “It can afflict any country or party.

“In 2014, the bedrock of the ‘Yes’ vote was the housing schemes.

“Triangulate your policies, ignore the pleas for Indyref2 or denigrate them as the Great Unwoke and you being to alienate.

“Prejudice needs abhorred and gender and identity politics have a place. But class and the economy remain fundamental. Forgetting your roots is political folly.”

Scottish Tory MSP Annie Wells said: “Kenny MacAskill is highlighting the arrogance that exists within the SNP.

“This being highlighted by such a senior figure in the party shows the civil war which is bubbling away and threatening to come to the surface.”

Liberal Democrat MSP Alex Cole-Hamilton said: "Despite a global pandemic raging, Kenny MacAskill cannot resist another round of internecine SNP internal warfare as he aggravates for independence.

"Perhaps he should take time out to consider how the broad shoulders of the UK economy have helped support Scottish workers through this crisis."

Mr MacAskill was also criticised last night after suggesting Scoland’s top law officer should be biased in favour of an independence referendum.

He said SNP ministers should have appointed a Lord Advocate “at least moderately sympathetic to their cause”.

READ MORE: MacAskill under fire after saying Lord Advocate should be pro-Indyref2

As head of Scotland’s prosecution service, as well as the Government’s most senior legal adviser, the Lord Advocate, currently James Wolffe QC, is supposed to act independently.

The Scottish LibDems said the Lord Advocate should not be a “political puppet” and accused Mr MacAskill of undermining the principle of independent advice to government.

Mr MacAskill made the comment just days after the SNP accused Boris Johnson of trying to politicise the civil service after the ousting of cabinet secretary Sir Mark Sedwill.

SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford said the forced departure of the UK’s most senior civil servant showed a “reckless approach to governance”.

Mr MacAskill complained that the Scottish Government had not gone to court to establish whether Holyrood could unilaterally stage Indyref2.

Under the Scotland Act, matters relating the Union are reserved to Westminster, but Holyrood’s ability to hold its own referendum has never been tested in court.

For the 2014 referendum, the UK and Scottish Governments agreed a legal process in which Holyrood was given temporary powers to hold the vote under a so-called Section 30 order.

In December, after the SNP won 48 of Scotland’s 59 seats in the general election, Nicola Sturgeon formally requested a similar transfer of power to stage Indyref2.

However the Prime Minister refused, saying the No result of 2014 should last a generation.

In the absence of a Section 30 order, senior SNP figures including MP Angus MacNeil have suggested a Plan B in which any SNP election win could trigger independence.

Yes campaigner Martin Keatings has also asked Scotland’s highest court to rule on whether Holyrood could hold a referendum under its existing powers without Westminster consent.

Mr MacAskill said it was now “time for a Plan B”, and that if Westminster blocked Indyref2, and election could “be treated as the deliberative vote”.

He added: “It’s surprising to say the least that the SNP leadership hasn’t sought to test the legal waters on holding their own.

READ MORE: YouGov Poll: Half of Conservative voters in England support English independence

“Many including Joanna Cherry MP have been advocating that and a court challenge is being mounted by frustrated ‘Yessers’.

“There’s good reason to believe that it’s as possible now as it was for Strathclyde [Regional Council] to consult on fluoridisation decades ago.

“The reason assumed by many is that the current Lord Advocate doesn’t believe it’s arguable though other senior legal figures disagree.

“Given a referendum was a core part of the SNP manifesto in 2016 you’d have thought they’d have ensured they appointed a law officer who was at least moderately sympathetic to their cause.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat MSP Liam McArthur said: “A former Justice Secretary should know that the job of the Lord Advocate is to offer accurate and dispassionate legal advice, not act as a political puppet, telling SNP parliamentarians what they want to hear.

“The Scottish Government should not be spending a single penny or a fleeting moment focused on independence when we are in the middle of a global pandemic.

“Even the First Minister has acknowledged that now is not the time. Kenny MacAskill should be focused on helping his constituents in a time of need, not undermining the work of the Lord Advocate.”

In 2011, while Alex Salmond’s Justice Secretary, Mr MacAskill was widely condemned after suggesting axing £500,000 of Scottish Government funding to the UK Supreme Court as he didn’t like its decisions.

He said: “I am not going to pay for ambulance-chasing courts. I am not paying money that would come out of the police budget, or prison budget or community payback budget because they are routinely taking cases that we as a country do not think should be going there. He who pays the piper, as they say, calls the tune.”

The former Solicitor General Lord McCluskey said Mr MacAskill ought to be “ashamed” of his comments and called his funding threat “unsuitable for a man holding his office”.

Mr Salmond ultimately over-ruled Mr MacAskill on the issue.