The family of George Floyd are to sue the city of Minneapolis and the police officers who are charged in his death.
Lawyers plan to announce the lawsuit on Wednesday, with Ben Crump planning a late-morning news conference in the city to detail the action.
Floyd died on May 25 after Derek Chauvin pressed his knee against his neck for nearly eight minutes as Floyd said he could not breathe.
Chauvin is charged with second-degree murder, third-degree murder and manslaughter.
Three other officers at the scene – Tou Thao, Thomas Lane and J Kueng – are charged with aiding and abetting both second-degree murder and manslaughter.
READ MORE: Be honest about the nature of racism in Scotland
All four officers were fired the day after Mr Floyd’s death, which set off protests that spread around the world.
His death also sparked calls to abolish the Minneapolis Police Department and replace it with a new public safety department.
A majority of city council members support the move, saying the department has a long history and culture of brutality that has resisted change.
A public hearing is planned later on Wednesday on the proposal, which requires a change in the city’s charter that could go to voters in November.
The lawsuit comes on the same day that a court allowed public viewing by appointment of video from the body cameras of Lane and Kueng.
READ MORE: Washington Redskins: NFL franchise to drop controversial name and logo
A coalition of news organisations and lawyers for Lane and Kueng have been advocating to make the videos public, saying they would provide a more complete picture of what happened when Mr Floyd was taken into custody.
The judge has not said why he is not allowing the video to be disseminated more widely.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel