A MAN who admitted planting a hoax bomb at a polling station on last year's General Election day has been jailed for three years.
Peter Conoboy placed the device in the foyer of the tower block where he lived in Motherwell, near a community centre that was to be used as a polling station on December 12.
The 48-year-old previously admitted the offence at the High Court in Glasgow last month, when no motive for his actions was made clear.
Appearing again today for sentencing via video link, Conoboy was sentenced by judge Lord Matthews to three years in prison with two years and three months still to serve.
The court previously heard bomb disposal experts believed the device - spotted at 12.50am by a resident making a phone call - was viable but after it was disabled through a controlled explosion it was found to be a hoax.
Lord Matthews told Conoboy residents in the ground, first and second floors of Glen Tower had to be evacuated, which he said would have been "irritating" given the time of day.
He also said the incident would have caused emergency services "considerable expense and inconvenience".
People who were registered to vote at the tower block were told to attend an alternative polling station at Knowetop Primary School in the town.
No how-to guides on explosives were found on Conoboy's phone or laptop but five videos of terror attacks were discovered, including those on London Bridge and in Christchurch, New Zealand.
William Lavelle, representing Conoboy, told the court his client "couldn't remember any videos" that had been referenced and added his son used the same computer to listen to rap music.
Lavelle also said he had "no explanation why Mr Conoboy did this" but told the court he had been drinking alcohol that night, which "no doubt played a part".
Lord Matthews said background reports suggested Conoboy had "problems with mental health ... but had not been diagnosed as suffering from any mental illness".
He added the only conclusion was "this episode was caused or contributed to by gross intoxication".
Sentencing Conoboy, Lord Matthews told him his "conduct will not be tolerated".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel