The Glasgow schoolgirl who spearheaded the SQA exam results protest has said she is "elated" after the Education Secretary announced a dramatic U-turn on this year's downgraded marks.
The 17-year-old was joined by pupils across Scotland last week as she organised a protest that made calls to the Scottish Government to take urgent action after 124,000 grade recommendations from teachers were rejected.
She earlier told our sister title, the Glasgow Times: "We are campaigning for a case of our voices being heard. We're being marked down unfairly because we live in what is described as lower-class areas.
READ MORE: Pupil who led SQA exam protest responds to Nicola Sturgeon's apology
"It's not fair on us as pupils and it isn't fair on the teachers at all either. They've been asked to make a judgement and then they're being downgraded from that judgement.
"We're being downgraded based on where we live, it isn't fair that people from affluent areas can do quite bad in their prelims and come out with all A's."
Education Secretary John Swinney announced yesterday afternoon that 75,000 downgraded results would be withdrawn.
Mr Swinney apologized to every young person who had their result downgraded from the estimate supplied by their teacher.
Speaking with the Daily Record, the St Andrew's High School pupil said: "It just feels really unbelievable.
“We thought we would get some sort of attention but never thought it would get this far.
READ MORE: Opinion: Iain Macwhirter: All shall have prizes in the great exams U-turn – except John Swinney
“I thought maybe there would be a different system or a longer process but never believed this would happen.
“I never thought there would be a complete U-turn like this, it just seems completely incredible. I feel elated.”
Erin had previously been degraded in four of her higher exams. She will start her final year at St Andrew's High School with a hopeful outlook to her future.
The U-turn on degaded results will mean a pass rate of 88.9% at National 5 which is an increase of 10%. A pass rate of 89.2% at Higher, up 14.2% and advanced higher pass rate at 93.1% an increase of 13.7%.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here