MSPs should be kicked out of Holyrood if they fail to show up for as long as former Finance Secretary Derek Mackay, the Scottish Conservatives have said.
Tory MSP Graham Simpson said he planned to bring forward a “Mackay’s Law” to remove MSPs who fail to take part in parliamentary proceedings for six months.
A similar rule already applies to councillors, however there is no equivalent for MSPs.
Mr Mackay resigned on the eve of the Scottish budget on February 6 after the Scottish Sun revealed he had been pestering a 16-year-old schoolboy on social media.
The paper reported the 42-year-old MSP had contacted the boy out of the blue without knowing his age the previous August, then sent him 270 messages over six months.
Mr Mackay, who came out as gay in 2013, had been tipped as a future First Minister until the scandal abruptly ended his political career.
The Renfrewshire North and West MSP has not been seen at Holyrood since, and the SNP is now in the process of selecting a new candidate for his seat in 2021.
However by continuing as a nominal Independent MSP for more than six months, Mr Mackay has so far received more than £32,000 in salary.
He was also paid an automatic severance payment of £11,945 for loss of ministerial office.
His conduct has prompted calls for new mechanisms to remove errant MSPs or those who neglect their duties, such as the election petition that applies to MPs.
Mr Simpson said he intended to introduce a private members bill in the next parliament which would mean any MSP who failed to show up to Holyrood for six months could no longer remain as a member of the Scottish Parliament
With more Holyrood business being conducted online because of coronavirus, any MSPs would took part in virtual proceedings would not be caught by such a law.
Mr Simpson said: “Most councils have rules on this and if Derek Mackay was a councillor and hadn’t done his job for six months then he would have been drummed out.
“But there are no rules covering MSPs’ attendance, which means they can do nothing and pocket the cash.
“In theory, you could act like Derek Mackay is currently doing for five years. That is just wrong.
“If you are elected to the Scottish Parliament you should be a worker not a shirker. Nothing else should be allowed.
“If Mr Mackay had any honour left he would stand down now and allow the people of Renfrewshire North and West to elect someone who will properly represent them.”
The Scottish Liberal Democrats, who have also advocated the removal of wayward MSPs, said it was an "interesting idea".
A spokesperson said: "For some time we have favoured a system of recall which has been debated and discussed.
"We still hope we can persuade other parties to support it.
"The six-month rule is an interesting idea which is worthy of further consideration."
Scottish Labour Business Manager Elaine Smith said: “Scottish Labour agrees with the principles behind this proposal and supports any action taken to hold MSPs, such as Derek Mackay, that continually fail to fulfil their duties as representatives to account.
“However, we must have provisions put in place to ensure MSPs who are absent from the chamber for six months for health, family or other legitimate reasons are not penalised for their absence.”
A spokesperson for the Scottish Greens said: “It’s essential that Parliament’s procedures are fit for purpose, and that action can be taken where an MSP is found guitly of gross misconduct which would see them dismissed from any other job. This must be an independent process, and not become a political football.
“This isn't simply about attendance though. It would be unacceptable if a new parent was compelled to attend while on parental leave, or a seriously ill MSP was forced to put their health at risk for instance.
“Graham Simpson's proposal would only deal with a tiny number of cases.
"The bigger problem is those politicians - including many of Mr Simpson's party colleagues - who treat the public with contempt by taking on second or third jobs on top of their very well paid role as parliamentarians.”
An SNP spokesperson said: "Any proposals such as those the Tories are suggesting would apply to all parties, and would be for Parliament as a whole to discuss.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel