THE proposal to withdraw and reduce funding for Glasgow Citizens |Advice bureaux must be one of the most disastrous decisions to be made by any organisation in the UK ("Outcry as Glasgow council plans to shut much-needed CABS in deprived areas", The Herald, September 2). Any financial saving will be dwarfed by the ensuing costs arising from and compounded by the misery already caused to the disadvantaged, poor and sick people in Glasgow. It is inconceivable that councillors are not aware of the wonderful work done by this organisation in the many articles printed in The Herald over the last few months. Successful appeals on Benefits claims show clearly the refusal of lawful claims being rejected the Government's benefits agency.
The Scottish Government has helped to mitigate the Westminster benefits cuts to some measure but has failed to give sufficient financial support to some of the most deprived people in the European Union in the past.
I worked for 14 years in East Dunbartonshire (reputed to be an affluent area) for this organisation as a volunteer and we were well supported by our local council and Holyrood and I was backed by staff and volunteers who were dedicated to supporting people from all walks of life, from the well-heeled to the destitute, and it was truly inspiring to be involved in this work.
This action must not be implemented and more thought must be given to this situation, as so many vulnerable people who cannot survive without help as their plight needs continuous attention before more misery is heaped on them.
Ian Turner, Bearsden.
GIN SLING
FOLLOWING Ron Mackenna’s review of Crossbasket Castle ("Scottish standards with some fairy-dust in sumptuous surroundings", Herald Magazine, August 29), I feel compelled to contact you.
I understand that as the managing director of Inverlochy Castle Management International (ICMI) – which manages Crossbasket Castle – this letter may cause an initial eye-roll as I leap to the defence of my team. However, I owe it to them to offer a rebuttal.
I’ll begin by addressing the glaringly obvious – for a non-drinker such as Ron to attend a gin pairing menu makes as much sense as a non-meat eater choosing to review the country’s top steak restaurant.
Let’s choose to believe that Ron did, as he states, overlook the entire point of the Roux August evenings – the paired menu; although for a series of events explicitly marketed as alcohol pairing dinners to encourage people to eat out after lockdown, how this was missed when he was booking dinner to attend with a 17-year old astounds me.
I find it entirely unjust to go on to penalise the castle on something that was missed on his end. To arrive late and then refer to the front of house team member as “chuntering on about, sigh, gin” – on an evening about gin – is quite frankly farcical.
Over the coming months we will host a variety of events at Crossbasket – from gourmet dinners to yoga events. I am confident our customers will know whether they prefer venison to vinyasa and book accordingly, which is a sure way to avoid disappointment.
Norbert Lieder, Fort William.
WOKE MEANS BROKE
I FOR one welcome the first same sex-couple in Strictly Come Dancing, confident as I am it will be as much a ratings success as the first female Doctor Who.
Given the over-50s demographic Strictly was always aimed at (it wasn't coincidence that it was fronted for most of its 16 years by icon of TV's "golden era", Bruce Forsyth), ratings will crash faster than a high street store's takings during the Covid-19 lockdown.
Unable to ever accept it's wrong, the ever-PC BBC will rush to compound its folly and cave into demands to make half the couples same-sex.
Before long its Borehamwood money-spinner will become a money pit as Strictly viewers turn off en masse, and its last waltz announced with excuses of "a worn-out format."
Don't say you weren't warned Auntie Beeb – go woke, go broke.
Mark Boyle, Johnstone.
GONE WHERE?
I ENJOYED your report on the Top 20 film scores ("Schindler’s List named nation’s favourite film score of all time", The Herald, September 21), but what happened to Gone With The Wind?
Alastair Macpherson, Alford.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel