A bombing in the Afghan capital targeted the convoy of the country's first vice president, killing 10 people and wounding more than a dozen others, including several bodyguards, the Interior Ministry has said.
No-one immediately claimed responsibility for the bombing and the Taliban quickly denied they were behind the attack in Kabul.
First vice president Amrullah Saleh suffered minor burns in the attack.
Mr Saleh, who is also Afghanistan's former intelligence chief, said in his first television appearance immediately after the attack that he was fine and had suffered only slight burns.
He appeared in the TV footage with bandages on one hand.
"Me and my younger son who was also with me are fine," Mr Saleh said in the footage.
"I have slight burns on my face and hand from the wave of the blast. I don't have exact details right now, but I apologise to those who suffered casualties and those who lost their property in the attack."
His spokesman Razwan Murad called the attack a "vicious terrorist attempt".
The roads in the vicinity of the bombing were closed off.
The Interior Ministry said the bomb went off as Mr Saleh's convoy was passing through a section of Kabul with shops that sell gas cylinders for use in heating homes and cooking.
The blast ignited a fire that set ablaze a number of shops.
The explosion left behind a scene of destruction - at least 10 shops were smouldering in the aftermath of the explosion that had also shattered windows of dozens of nearby homes, some with doors hanging off their hinges.
Cars were wrecked and debris was scattered around.
The Interior Ministry's spokesman Tariq Arian confirmed to The Associated Press earlier that the bombing targeted Mr Saleh's convoy.
Initially, Mr Arian said at least two civilians died but the death toll later rose to 10.
The ministry said at least 15 people were wounded.
Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahed was quick to deny the insurgents were involved in any way, saying that "today's explosion in Kabul has nothing to do with the Mujahedeen of the Islamic Emirate", as the Taliban call themselves.
Both the insurgents and so-called Islamic State are active in Kabul, where tensions are also high ahead of the expected start of negotiations between an official Afghan delegation and the Taliban.
Washington has been ramping up pressure on both sides to get the talks under way.
America's peace envoy Zalmay Khalilzad is in Qatar, where the Taliban maintain a political office, trying to get the negotiations started.
The negotiations, known as intra-Afghan talks, were envisaged as part of a peace deal the US signed with the Taliban in Qatar in February to end America's longest war.
At the time, the talks were cast as Afghanistan's best chance at peace after decades of conflict.
Kabul's peace negotiation team is waiting in the Afghan capital to travel to the Qatari capital Doha for the talks but delays have been relentless.
In recent days, Washington, officials in Kabul and the Taliban have all indicated that they could get under way imminently.
The US-Taliban deal allows for the exit of American soldiers from Afghanistan.
However, the US troop pullout, which has already begun, does not hinge on the success of intra-Afghan talks but rather on commitments from the Taliban to fight against other militant groups - such as IS - and to prevent Afghanistan from being a staging arena for attacks against the US and its allies.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here