Draconian measures, police powers and encouraging commerce were the Covid 19 issues debated by columnists in the newspapers yesterday.
The Daily Mail
Dominic Lawson said the Government’s Covid strategy was to ensure little disruption to business and schools and to let our social lives take the strain.
“The Government is now introducing what some describe as ‘draconian measures’ to ensure the public observes self-isolation rules (when quarantine is required): fines of up to £10,000 are to be imposed on the most heinous offenders, apparently,” he said. “But if you look at the Government’s website on rules mandating self-isolation for those returning from trips to nations with high infection rates, you will find that the list of ‘exceptions’ covering various jobs goes on for paragraph after paragraph.”
He said that Ken Marsh, chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, complained that the rule of six and its subsequent enforcement was simply creating animosity between the public and police.
“The truth is that these rules — designed to stop the rate of coronavirus infection climbing to the levels now seen in France and Spain — will fundamentally rest on individual decisions, not enforcement,” he said. “If people are worried about infection, they will react accordingly: thus the restaurant trade had collapsed even before the Government imposed lockdown on March 23.”
He said it was sad that socialising had to be constrained by rules which seemed so arbitrary and asked ‘why six exactly?’
“But if this form of contagion containment does not prevent the economy from continuing its strong recovery, then it’s endurable.”
The Guardian
John Harris said the effectiveness of the new rule of six was open to question, given that schools are back, people are being encouraged to work and restaurants are open.
“Then there is the biggest issue of all: the fact that breaking the rule is a criminal offence,” he said. “ Now, there are to be fines of up to £10,000 for people judged to have breached self-isolation rules, and the police will be checking compliance in the “highest incidence areas” and “high-risk groups”, based on “local intelligence”.
He said rising concerns about power, the state and people’s basic rights clearly belonged in the mainstream.
“The Covid-19 crisis has given rise to an awful imbalance: the state increasing its power to sow mistrust and punish, while failing on the more nurturing and protective responsibilities that are a much better answer to the pandemic,” he added. “Lockdowns, clampdowns and the long arm of the law are not a sustainable answer to the crisis we face: more terrifyingly still, they point to a future in which power might decisively slip free of any meaningful constraints.”
He argued that there should be no arguing about the the ‘awful reality’ of the pandemic, its threat to public health, or the fact that we should all be doing our bit.
“What we should be arguing about is whether bulldozing basic civil liberties is any kind of answer to the crisis, and where exactly that approach is already leading us,” he concluded.
The Daily Express
Leo McKinstry said the country was staring down the barrel of another coronavirus crisis.
“In the coming weeks the Government will face its sternest test by far,” he said. “The extraordinary circumstances of the moment call for robust, decisive leadership, based on a clear strategy, administrative competence and honesty with the public.”
He said those qualities had been sadly lacking in the Government’s Covid response so far.
“Within the Conservative party there is growing concern at Boris Johnson’s performance,” he claimed. “MPs privately mutter that he has still not recovered from his own Covid ordeal, with the result that he has lost some of his instinctive ebullience and natural authority.”
He said, however, that the swell of infections in Europe had not produced a rise in deaths.
“The daily fatality rate, averaging just 11 recently, is a tiny fraction of both the spring peak and the 1,600 deaths that occur every day,” he said. “Whitehall might be terrified of a “second wave”, but the damage from a second lockdown would be as frightening.
“The impact would see as many as 30,000 extra cancer deaths because of deferred treatment, as well as a surge in other problems like heart disease and mental illness.
A second lockdown would plunge our fragile economy, which is just beginning to enjoy a recovery, into another recession, perhaps even worse than the record-breaking contraction inflicted by the first.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here