STUART Waiton’s column ("Real reason behind the SNP’S anti-family legislation", The Herald, November 3) raises a number of issues and takes quite an extreme line. He seems to look for the worst possible motives in several pieces of recent or current legislation. His overall theme seems to be that we should do less to protect the minority of children who are in danger of harm.
On the Hate Crime Bill, I am afraid we still see in our society considerable expressions of hatred based on race, religion, disability, and a range of other characteristics. Humza Yousaf has already made it clear that intent will be required when considering whether someone is guilty of stirring up hatred against others. However, the chances of someone being prosecuted for something they say within their own home must be absolutely minuscule.
The Named Person scheme was a good concept which could have helped a number of vulnerable families in a constituency like mine. Many parents do not find it easy to challenge head teachers, GPs, or social workers if they are seeking help for their kids and are being passed from pillar to post. The named person would have been a help to such families.
Mr Waiton seems to ridicule the idea that parents might be held to account where their child is at "risk of harm". Yet sadly we have seen cases where a parent does not seek the medical treatment that a child needs, most recently when a mother apparently went to the pub and left her sick child alone to die. In such rare occasions, children are at risk and we need to act.
Again the suggestion is that it is fine for a parent to laugh at any joke their child makes about a Celtic or Rangers player. Is he saying that we just accept sectarian hatred and families have no responsibility for teaching their kids that anti-Irish, anti-Catholic, or anti-armed forces hatred is wrong? Of course it is incredibly unlikely that parents would be prosecuted for laughing at a joke. But surely we as a society have some duty to reduce the level of hatred we see around the Old Firm and the culture and politics of that?
John Mason, SNP MSP for Glasgow Shettleston, Glasgow G31.
GIVEN that Humza Yousaf allegedly wishes to remove the "dwelling defence" and potentially criminalise speech and conversation in people's homes, I remembered a rather pertinent song composed and performed by the Irish singer Colum Sands. He introduces his performance with the words "if people feel cautious of what to safely say in their own homes it is best to heed the words of the song and ... Whatever you say, say nothing". His audience is invited to join in the "suspicious" chorus if they feel that no-one is watching them. The performance is fairly light-hearted but the warning is there nevertheless.
I am in agreement with Sandy MacAlister (Letters, November 3). We have been warned. A future of saying nothing is not one for the free people of Scotland.
Thelma Edwards, Kelso.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel