Scottish MPs have tried to hold Alister Jack to account for his remarks about a second independence referendum.
During the monthly Scottish Questions session this morning, SNP MPs quizzed the Secretary of State for Scotland over the timings of another poll.
It comes after he stated it could be up to 40 years until another vote was granted by Westminster - a statement the MP has now rowed back on.
Mr Jack said that Scotland should not be subjected to constant "neverendums" and told the SNP they should "frankly accept" that a another vote is not likely within the next quarter of century.
It came in response to Dr Philippa Whitford, SNP MP for Central Ayrshire, who compared Scotland to a wife trapped in marriage.
She said: "I hope the Secretary of State isn’t suggesting there won’t be another one (independence referendum) for 40 years.
“He seems to think the way to strengthen the Union is by forcing a hard Brexit on Scotland against our will, taking an axe to devolution with the Internal Market Bill and denying any democratic choice on Scotland’s future until adults like me are dead.
“On that basis, does he think the best recipe for a happy marriage is to lock up the wife, take away her chequebook and just keep refusing a divorce?”
Mr Jack responded: “I think it’s quite straightforward – I think people should respect democracy...
“We are respecting democracy, we are saying we are acknowledging once in a generation, we don’t believe Scotland should be thrown (into) the uncertainty of ‘neverendums’, and it’s very straightforward.
“A generation, by any calculation, is 25 years and frankly, you just have to accept that and focus on what matters, which is recovering from this pandemic and us all pulling together.”
Mhairi Black, the SNP's shadow secretary of state, asked Mr Jack to point out where "it says in [the Edinburgh] agreement that there cannot be another referendum".
Mr Jack responded: “Well I commend (Ms Black) for trying to get a referendum into questions about the job retention scheme and actually, you know, while we’re all fighting this pandemic and trying to secure and support people’s jobs, it beggars belief that the SNP carry on talking about independence referendums and about separation.
“I find it really quite disappointing, but the answer to her question, it was mentioned many times in the White Paper that the SNP Government produced in advance of that referendum, once in a generation was mentioned on a number of pages.”
SNP MPs criticised Mr jack on social media after he appeared to come to the session ill-prepared to answer a question tabled by a Conservative MP.
MP John Howell had scheduled a question about what discussions Mr Jack has had with Rishi Sunak on "the economic support available for Scottish businesses during the Covid-19 outbreak."
However when called to answer the question, the Secretary of State appeared confused and eventually apologised, saying he "didn't bring that one" with him.
MPs could be heard laughing and sniggering in the Chamber.
Hannah Bardell, SNP MP for Livingston tweeted her frustration at the incident, saying: "The Sec of State for Scotland just stood up and said he didn’t bring an answer to question 16 and sat back down... queue much hilarity and confusion.
"Tories cannae even do the basics... #disrespect #dogatemyhomework."
Pete Wishart, SNP MP for Perth, said that the UK Government's consistent denial of a second referendum was only pushing the support for independence higher.
More than a dozen consecutive polls have now shown that a majority of Scots want Scotland to be an independent country.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel