IT’S not that long since former chancellor George Osborne insisted austerity was essential to balance the books. Theresa May let us in on her secret that there’s no “magic money tree”. It seems both were doomsters. Despite the looming post-Covid and Brexit financial meltdown, the Prime Minister bluffs and blusters, denying the need for more austerity. Despite the “sobering” figures, the Chancellor’s Spending Review side-stepped both austerity and Brexit. A forest of fast-growing money trees must have been planted since Mrs May’s time. Don’t forget the additional £16.5 billion for defence meantime ripening on the low hanging branches.
Mr Johnson can be optimistic; it’s unlikely he’ll be around when the chlorinated chickens come home to roost. Getting Brexit done has been an excellent preparation for post-Downing Street appearances on Fantasy Island and Would I Lie to You? The Chancellor already suspects when the music stops, he’ll be left holding the multi-billion-pound debt parcel. Last time, the weight of austerity crushed those who could least afford it. The “undeserving poor”, including the young, unemployed, sick, disabled and homeless continue to suffer the cruelty of Universal Credit, albeit temporarily enhanced. The Chancellor’s review spoke of “levelling up”, implying degrees of fairness noticeably absent from his party’s previous economic measures.
There’s not much levelling up when around 60,000 under 25s lost their jobs between July and September. There’s to be no austerity? Tell that to the 1.3 million public sector workers facing a wage freeze. You can’t spend a round of applause. The elderly shouldn’t be complacent. Perks like triple lock pension increases and winter fuel allowances have survived this time, but their days may well be numbered.
Injustice and non-accountability run through Mr Johnson’s government like a stick of Blackpool rock. His smug “pride” in the shameless cronyism of non-competitive Covid contracts tells us all we need to know about the Government’s modus operandi. Mates rates will ensure even more profit for the ranks of London – centric accountants, consultants and lobbyists who have already made a killing from Covid relief measures.Afterall, Mr Johnson believes a pound spent in Croydon is more valuable than a pound spent in Strathclyde.
The eyewatering bill for Covid and yes, Brexit, will have to be settled sooner or later. We all need to do our bit, and that includes better-off pensioners. This time though, the burden must be shared more equally. The Chancellor will have to grasp the nettle of substantial tax increases for example on those who have profited hugely from the pandemic. But, will fairness provide the foundations for “build back better”? Don’t put the mortgage on it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here