NICOLA Sturgeon has denied being “out of touch” with her party’s grassroots over how to achieve independence in the face of Westminster blocking a referendum.
The First Minister mocked the “Plan B” for independence backed by some of her MPs, who say a simple SNP election win should be a mandate for leaving the Union.
Ms Sturgeon said it suffered from a glaring “logical flaw”.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland on the third and final day of the SNP’s virtual conference, Ms Sturgeon was asked about a growing internal tensions in her party.
SNP MP Joanna Cherry QC complained last week about a “cult” of personality around Ms Sturgeon and a “no debate mentality” that diminished the party.
Ms Sturgeon was also asked what she would do if Boris Johnson stuck to his pledge not to grant Indyref2, even if the SNP win a second majority at Holyrood in 2021.
The First Minister refused to rule out testing whether Holyrood had the power to hold a referendum without Westminster’s consent in the courts.
However she said her clear preference remained an agreed referendum as in 2014, which would be beyond legal challenge and deliver an internationally recognised result.
But with growing restlessness in the Yes movement about Westminster blocking Indyref2, she was asked: “Isn’t there a danger you’re out of touch with people in your party?”
She said: “There was a debate on this at the SNP conference yesterday and the position that was put forward was overwhelmingly supported, so no, I think all of the evidence would suggest otherwise.”
Pressed on whether to have an election-based Plan B if Mr Johnson kept blocking a referendum, Ms Sturgeon was cutting about its chances.
She said: “What do you think they [the UK Government] would do then? Do you think they’re just going to say, ‘Well, ok, we won’t accept the election result ion favour of a referendum, but we’ll accept it in favour of independence.’ There’s a bit of a logical flaw there.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel