Westminster’s lack of engagement with Scotland over Brexit has been branded foolish by the country’s Rural Economy Secretary.
Fergus Ewing told the Holyrood’s Rural Economy and Connectivity Committee there had been no “meaningful” engagement between Westminster and Holyrood on the future of the sector ahead of the end of the transition period.
The future of fishing, farming and food standards were some of the major issues during the Brexit referendum and all would have an impact on Scotland.
However, Mr Ewing said: “I’ve participated in many meetings with the UK Government and I’ve always sought to have a constructive relationship with the four Defra secretaries that have come and gone.
“But I think that it would be fair to say that the engagement hasn’t been meaningful.”
Representatives of the Scottish Government have not been involved in negotiations with the EU despite requests for this to be the case, Mr Ewing said.
The Cabinet Secretary said there had been “courtesy, there’s been lots of interchange and there’s been work on frameworks”, but the Scottish Government has not been involved in the “really big decisions”, despite requests.
Fergus Ewing
Later in the session, Mr Ewing said, despite a direct request to Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove, the Scottish Government was not included in negotiations on fishing rights.
He said: “This is just a very foolish approach. Frankly, the Scottish officials have the knowledge about Scottish fishing interests.
“I’m afraid the UK officials don’t have the same degree of knowledge, probably because it’s not their direct responsibility, therefore they’re not so familiar with the highly complex issues involved and this is extremely unfortunate and potentially damaging.”
READ MORE: Office of Budget Responsibility warns of no-deal impact
Mr Ewing also said some UK officials had looked to legislate in devolved areas, making him “extremely concerned”.
He told the committee: “UK officials seem to think that it is for them to take decisions on devolved issues and I am raising this with (UK Environment Secretary) George Eustice.”
Mr Ewing did not say what decisions have been made by UK officials or what attempts had been made to take decisions in devolved areas.
Meanwhile, the Rural Economy Secretary was asked about a possible cash injection from the UK Government’s Shared Prosperity Fund for Scottish farmers.
The controversial fund will allow the UK Government to spend cash directly in Scotland, regardless of whether or not the area is under Holyrood control.
It would accept direct applications from councils, businesses, community groups and MPs.
However, Mr Ewing said the only thing known about the fund is its name.
He said: “It’s becoming like a sad joke at the moment.
“There’s about as much facts and evidence at the moment re: the UK Government’s plans about this UK Shared Prosperity Fund as there is an evidential basis to the source of funding of Santa Claus’ largesse.”
READ MORE: Long queues in Kent on M20 caused by Brexit border control tests at Channel Tunnel
A UK Government spokesman said: “It is untrue that our engagement with the Scottish Government is not meaningful.
“Ministers from the Scottish Government are invited to regular meetings of the Exit Operations (XO) Cabinet Committee.
“This is in addition to various further official and ministerial engagements, including six Joint Ministerial Council meetings on EU negotiations this year, with another meeting tomorrow.
“The UK Shared Prosperity Fund will help to level up and create opportunity across the UK and we will work closely with the devolved administrations and other interested parties across the UK as we develop the fund.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel