DAVID Pratt’s column in Thursday’s paper highlighted the electoral hazards of infighting amongst supporters of independence, but misses the reasons for the apparent eruption (SNP infighting cripples battle against looming Brexit doom, December 3).
In recent years, any question of the direction of the SNP’s travel has been stifled and doubts about the priorities of the party have been ignored. This led to many ordinary supporters feeling totally ignored. The boil had to burst or many would have sat at home rather than take part in campaign work for the 2021 election.
The party’s hierarchy must take this on board and realise that their attitude to date has largely been responsible for the formation of other independence parties.
A tin ear to the members and supporters is no way to motivate the foot soldiers of the movement.
Had they been prepared to listen rather than sideline suggestions from outside their clique, the recent internal committee changes would not have been necessary.
The newly elected post holders should bear this in mind, they are not the sole fountain of wisdom. Criticism where valid should be accepted or coherent reasons given for rejection.
The practices of recent years must not recur in such crucial times for the independence movement. It’s not all about a party – it’s aims that matter.
Drew Reid
Falkirk
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here