MSPs have called for further changes to the Scottish Government's controversial Hate Crime Bill, emphasising the need for education - not just legislation.
Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf already announced plans to amend the legislation after an outcry over proposals on offences of “stirring-up hatred”, which critics fear could stifle freedom of expression.
And after scrutinising the Scottish Government’s plans, MSPs on Holyrood’s Justice Committee now say they believe additional changes are needed.
The committee has recommended the Scottish Parliament back the general principles of the Bill “subject to those amendments being made”.
Convener Adam Tomkins said the committee is unanimous in calling for more changes.
The Scottish Government introduced the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Bill after a review of current legislation by Lord Bracadale.
Despite Mr Yousaf pledging to make amendments to the Bill, MSPs on the Justice Committee want provisions concerning the safeguarding of free speech to be “deepened and strengthened”.
READ MORE: Holocaust deniers 'potentially given defence' after hate crime u-turn
In a new report on the Bill, the committee demand the “reasonableness” defence available to those who are charged with “stirring-up” offences must be clarified.
MSPs also argued that for behaviour to be considered “abusive” under the terms of legislation, prosecutors must be required to show a “reasonable person” would consider this to be the case – claiming this would set a higher bar for prosecutions.
While the committee said “hate crime offences are no more acceptable if they are committed inside a person’s home than in public places”, MSPs added care should be taken to ensure people are not prosecuted for expressing their views in a private space if there is “no public element”.
The report is clear the Bill is “not intended to prohibit speech which others may find offensive” – stressing the “right to freedom of speech includes the right to offend, shock or disturb”.
MSPs said education – and not just legislation – is ultimately what is needed to tackle hate crime.
The report states: “Hate crime legislation will not, of itself, rid Scotland of prejudice.
“In pursuing that goal, education is likely to be far more important than necessarily creating new criminal offences.
“As such, the committee seeks further information from the Scottish Government on what further steps it proposes to take and what additional resources it intends to provide, including in relation to education, to tackle prejudice in Scottish society.”
Mr Tomkins said “balancing freedom of expression and legislating to ensure hateful actions can be prosecuted is a difficult task”.
He added: “We believe that, if amended in line with our unanimous recommendations, this Bill should be fit to protect the communities it affords extra protections to without encroaching on the ability of citizens to have robust debates, hold views others find unpalatable and express themselves freely.”
Mr Tomkins said it is “testament to the open-mindedness of all members” that the committee had “found such consensus on what has undoubtedly been a contentious piece of legislation”.
Mr Yousaf said the Scottish Government will give the recommendations “full consideration” ahead of Holyrood debating the Bill on Tuesday.
He said he hopes MSPs “can listen to the voices of those affected by hate crime and come together to support the general principles of this legislation”.
The Justice Secretary added: “The parliamentary debate will provide the opportunity for MSPs to find consensus on how we collectively and effectively tackle hate crime, working together to ensure Scotland is an inclusive and forward-thinking society that safeguards all of its people and communities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel