A judge has granted a stay in what was set to be the US government's first execution of a female inmate in nearly seven decades.
Lisa Montgomery killed an expectant mother, cut the baby from her womb and passed off the newborn as her own.
Judge Patrick Hanlon granted the stay late on Monday, citing the need to determine Montgomery's mental competence, reported the Topeka Capital-Journal.
Montgomery faced execution on Tuesday at the Federal Correctional Complex in Terre Haute, Indiana, just eight days before president-elect Joe Biden, an opponent of the federal death penalty, takes office.
She drove about 170 miles from her farmhouse in Melvern, Kansas, to the northwest Missouri town of Skidmore under the guise of adopting a rat terrier puppy from Bobbie Jo Stinnett, a 23-year-old dog breeder.
Montgomery strangled Ms Stinnett with a rope before performing a crude caesarean and fleeing with the baby.
She was arrested the next day after showing off the premature infant, Victoria Jo, who is now 16 years old and has not spoken publicly about the tragedy.
"As we walked across the threshold, our Amber Alert was scrolling across the TV at that very moment," recalled Randy Strong, who was part of the northwest Missouri major case squad at the time.
He looked to his right and saw Montgomery holding the newborn and was awash with relief when she handed her over to law enforcement.
The preceding hours had been a blur in which he photographed Ms Stinnett's body and spent a sleepless night looking for clues - unsure of whether the baby was dead or alive and no idea what she looked like.
But then tips began arriving about Montgomery, who had a history of faking pregnancies and suddenly had a baby.
Mr Strong, now the sheriff of Nodaway County, where the killing happened, got in an unmarked car with another officer.
He learned while en route that the email address fischer4kids@hotmail.com that was used to set up the deadly meeting with Ms Stinnett had been sent from a dial-up connection at Montgomery's home.
Read more: Neil Mackay: We’re all weak, fallible humans. That is why I oppose the death penalty
"I absolutely knew I was walking into the killer's home," recalled Mr Strong, saying rat terriers ran around his feet as he approached her house.
Like Ms Stinnett, Montgomery also raised rat terriers.
Ms Stinnett's mother, Becky Harper, sobbed as she told a Missouri dispatcher about stumbling across her daughter in a pool of blood, her womb slashed open and the child she had been carrying missing.
"It's like she exploded or something," Ms Harper told the dispatcher on December 16 2004, during the desperate yet futile attempt to get help for her daughter.
Prosecutors said Montgomery's motive was that her ex-husband knew she had undergone a tubal ligation that made her sterile and planned to reveal she was lying about being pregnant in an effort to get custody of two of their four children.
Needing a baby before a fast-approaching court date, Montgomery turned her focus on Ms Stinnett, whom she had met at dog shows.
Montgomery's lawyers, though, have argued that sexual abuse during Montgomery's childhood led to mental illness.
Lawyer Kelley Henry spoke in favour of Monday's decision, saying in a statement to the Capital-Journal that "Mrs Montgomery has brain damage and severe mental illness that was exacerbated by the lifetime of sexual torture she suffered at the hands of caretakers".
Her stepfather denied the sexual abuse in videotaped testimony and said he did not have a good memory when confronted with a transcript of a divorce proceeding in which he admitted some physical abuse.
Her mother testified that she never filed a police complaint because he had threatened her and her children.
But the jurors who heard the case, some crying through the gruesome testimony, disregarded the defence in convicting her of kidnapping resulting in death.
Prosecutors argued that Ms Stinnett regained consciousness and tried to defend herself as Montgomery used a kitchen knife to cut the baby girl from her womb.
Later that day, Montgomery called her husband to pick her up in the car park of a Long John Silver's in Topeka, Kansas, telling him she had delivered the baby earlier in the day at a nearby birthing centre.
She eventually confessed, and the rope and bloody knife used to kill Ms Stinnett were found in her car.
A search of her computer showed she used it to research caesareans and order a birthing kit.
Ms Stinnett's husband Zeb told jurors his world "crashed to an end" when he learned his wife was dead.
He said he did not return for months to the couple's home in Skidmore, a small farming community that earlier gained notoriety after the 1981 killing of town bully Ken Rex McElroy in front of a crowd of people who refused to implicate the killer or killers.
That crime was chronicled in a book, In Broad Daylight, as well as a TV movie, the film Without Mercy and the miniseries No One Saw A Thing.
Recently, on Victoria Jo's birthday, he sent Mr Strong a message through Facebook Messenger thanking him.
"I just wept," Mr Strong recalled.
"He is going to constantly be reminded of this, whether in his nightmares or somebody is going to call and want to interview him. The family doesn't want to be interviewed. They want to be left alone. The community of Skidmore has had a troubling past and history. They didn't want this. They didn't deserve this."
Montgomery was originally scheduled to be put to death on December 8.
But the execution was temporarily blocked after her lawyers contracted coronavirus visiting her in prison.
The resumption of federal executions after a 17-year pause started on July 14.
Anti-death penalty groups said President Donald Trump was pushing for executions prior to the November election in a cynical bid to burnish a reputation as a law-and-order leader.
US officials have portrayed the executions as bringing long-delayed justice for victims and their families.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here