A German MEP was has said that European Parliament debates are duller without the British as fewer native English speakers mean exchanges lack humour, irony and sarcasm
German politician David McAllister was commenting following almost a year of no British MEPs at the European Parliament.
He told the PA that UK MEPs had “left a footprint” in the European Parliament through their work and were missed on an individual basis.
English was the “lingua franca” of the European Parliament, despite it having 24 official languages.
On the change he said: “We also miss our British colleagues for their pragmatism, and their humour and rhetoric.”
“So we are operating in a parliament where a lot of English is spoken, but hardly any native speakers are still here.
“We have our Irish colleagues, we might have a few Maltese colleagues, and then we might have a few colleagues from other countries who like me have a British background.
“But we have a lot of political debates in working groups, in committees, in the plenary, speaking English but without the speakers being native English speakers.
“And that means that certain elements of political speech are just less now common here because the British are no longer there – when it comes to humour, irony, sarcasm, using proverbs or other style elements.
“The British MEPs were always at a huge advantage in an open debate because they simply have a better command of the English language.”
He said the UK MEPs – who left Brussels following Britain’s departure from the EU on January 31 2020 – had brought “real spice” to the political debate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here