KWASI Kwarteng, the new Business Secretary, has confirmed the UK Government is considering scrapping some European Union labour laws but insisted there would be no “bonfire of rights” or “whittling down” of standards.
Measures that the minister is looking at, using the UK’s new freedom to diverge from Brussels as a result of Brexit, include the working time directive, which enshrines a 48-hour week.
Ed Miliband for Labour claimed the Government wanted to take a “wrecking ball” to hard-won rights while the SNP’s Drew Hendry claimed Mr Kwarteng wanted a “race to the bottom in standards”.
The Secretary of State told MPs there would be no “bonfire of rights” but confirmed the review of EU-derived labour laws.
“The view was that we wanted to look at the whole range of issues relating to our EU membership and examine what we wanted to keep, if you like,” explained Mr Kwarteng.
But he told MPs: “The idea that we are trying to whittle down standards, that’s not at all plausible or true.”
And the minister stressed: “We are absolutely looking at safeguarding employment rights. I know there’s been stories in the newspapers that there’s going to be some sort of bonfire of rights. This could not be further from the truth and I feel like I have to rebut this very clearly.”
Appearing before the Commons Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee for the first time since taking up his role, the Business Secretary said: “I’m very struck as I look at EU economies how many EU countries - it’s about 17 or 18 - have essentially opted out of the working time directive.
“So, even by just following that we are way above the average European standard and I want to maintain that. We can be a high-wage, high-employment economy, a very successful economy, and that’s what we should be aiming for.”
But Mr Miliband, his Labour Shadow, noted: “After dismissing media reports and promising the Government has no plans to rip up workers’ rights, Kwasi Kwarteng has now let the cat out of the bag and admitted that they are conducting a review of those rights; including opting out of the 48-hour week, which protects workers in key sectors like the NHS, road haulage and airlines from working excessive hours.
“A government committed to maintaining existing protections would not be reviewing whether they should be unpicked. This exposes that the Government’s priorities for Britain are totally wrong.”
Mr Hendry, the SNP’s business spokesman, said: “If the Tories were intent on protecting workers’ rights then they would simply maintain those that were already enshrined in EU law – rather than ploughing ahead with a review and selecting what they want to keep.
“The harsh reality is that the Tories’ empty pledge to protect rights is, as feared, nothing more than smoke and mirrors with this review paving the way for an assault on protections that millions of workers depend on.”
Meanwhile, Joao Vale de Almeida, the EU’s ambassador to the UK, said Brussels could retaliate under the “level playing field” commitments in the Brexit trade deal if the UK Government decided to turn the country into a Singapore-style low-tax, low-regulation economy .
“The issue is well-organised in terms of the deal to allow us to address some divergences that may come up but that’s the choice of the UK; how far they want to go on that,” he said.
“It will be for us to judge the extent to which it violates this principle of ‘level playing field’ and if that is the case there are mechanisms in the treaty, in the agreement, that allow us to discuss and eventually to come to an understanding – if no understanding there are retaliation measures that can be applied on both sides.”
Mr de Almeida also addressed the issue of financial services – where Boris Johnson admitted the deal had not gone as far as he would have liked – insisting that was not an attempt to punish the UK.
“We are not in the business of punishing,” he told a Bright Blue think tank event.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel