MSPs have recommended that Holyrood should be able to conduct its business remotely on a permanent basis.
A cross-party group which has been investigating the Parliament's response to the pandemic has called for some of the temporary changes should be adopted full-time.
The Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee said remote voting, along with virtual or hybrid meetings where some MSPs join by video link, should be allowed to continue beyond the pandemic if necessary.
They also recommended creating a new rule which makes it easier to change the parliament’s standing orders.
In February last year, before the pandemic began, SNP MSP Gail Ross announced she was stepping down at May’s election because of “the demands of travelling to Edinburgh and being away from home for sometimes five days a week, every week”.
Committee convener, Bill Kidd said: “The pandemic had an immediate impact on the work of the Scottish Parliament, with huge changes to how we operate and conduct our business being made quickly.
“We should rightly reflect on the success of these in allowing all MSPs to not only contribute to debates, but to scrutinise and vote on legislation. Something that has not happened in all legislatures.
“What has been clear to us during this inquiry, is that many of these changes need to become permanent to help ensure that parliament is as resilient as possible for all future challenges.”
Deputy convener Patrick Harvie added: “There is little doubt that the world has changed dramatically in the course of less than a year.
“The changes that were introduced in the parliament were done initially out of necessity, but they have taught us that the parliament must be ready to face future challenges and carry out its vital function of holding the government to account. Something that is even more crucial in times of crisis.
“Our report today makes it clear that, not only do we think that some of these innovations should stay, but that in the next session of parliament work should be done to ensure that these procedures are as robust as possible as we move out of the pandemic, and beyond.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel