JOE Biden's move to suspend crippling whisky tariffs on imports to the US has created a "window of opportunity" for a wider trade deal across the Atlantic, according to a senior Conservative.
Greg Hands MP, UK Government Trade Minister, told the Herald that the country was in a "good place" to negotiate a full agreement with the US, and said the tariff suspension was a springboard to end retaliatory fees between the two countries once and for all.
Writing exclusively for the Herald, the Prime Minister has said that Scottish industry has a key role to play in the country's Covid recovery efforts and hailed the tariff suspension as a sign that the "UK isn't afraid to stand up for the rights of British business".
READ MORE: Boris Johnson: Tariff move shows UK Government has Scottish business at heart
It was announced yesterday that President Biden has agreed to suspend the 25% levy on Scotch whisky for four months, along with a reduction in tariffs for other goods such as cashmere, cheese and molluscs.
It comes after International Trade Secretary Liz Truss announced in December that she would not continue to impose tariffs on US products coming to the UK, such as bourbon and vodka.
Minister Hands said he was unsure if the agreement would have been possible under Donald Trump, adding: "What it does show is the new US administration reacting well to a bold move by the UK Government"
He added: "It was a very difficult thing to do before, in the kind of the interregnum if you like, without having a US Trade Representative. Now that [Biden's trade representative] Katherine Tai is getting her feet under the table that has made it possible.
"I just don't know whether the outgoing Trump administration would have made the same decision."
READ MORE: Cheers Joe! President Biden agrees to lift crippling tariffs on Scotch whisky
He said the move presents a "window of opportunity" to "solve all of these tariff disputes that we have inherited" and explained: "There's now a great opportunity for us, working with the new Biden administration to solve this dispute and others because [they] are only harming consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic."
Ms Truss was criticised widely for the decision not to re-impose the tariffs on US goods in December, mainly by the aviation sector as well as opposition parties.
Labour's shadow trade secretary Emily Thornberry said Ms Truss was "unilaterally capitulating" without any guarantee that the US would reciprocate.
Mr Hands said that the suspension of the tariffs showed the UK Government's controversial move had been the right one.
He explained: "We took quite a bit of criticism, mainly from parts of the aviation industry, not to roll over the retaliatory tariffs.
"It was a popular decision with the Scotch whisky industry, a popular decision in Scotland, and I think it's been proven to be right. We've now made really good progress.
"We're hopeful this shows there is a general signal to come to an overall settlement as well. It was a controversial decision but has been shown to be absolutely correct."
Despite Ms Truss's earlier decision only being possible due to Brexit, Minister Hands said he did not want to focus on the UK leaving the EU, and instead "celebrate the UK and US".
The tariffs arose a result of a dispute between the US and EU over illegal subsidies paid to their aircraft manufacturers, Boeing and Airbus, respectively.
A series of tit-for-tat levies were then places on good from the EU and US.
Since leaving the EU the UK has been able to decide its own way forward on tariffs on US products.
READ MORE: New move to end damaging whisky tariffs taken by UK Government
The fees had been crippling to the Scotch whisky industry, with exports plummeting by 35% since they were imposed in October 2019, costing half a billion pounds.
Mr Hands paid tribute to the effort of the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) for its efforts in helping with the dispute, as well as consumers.
Karen Betts, SWA chief executive, said the industry was "breathing a sigh of relief", adding: "The UK Government and the new US administration will now need to work hard on finding a negotiated settlement to this long-running aerospace dispute.
"We hope too that both governments will be able to find a rapid, pragmatic solution to the steel and aluminium dispute which still impacts US whiskey exports to the UK
Billy Walker, whisky industry veteran and co-owner of The GlenAllachie Distillers Company, said the SWA had "played a blinder".
He said: " To be honest, I am really surprised as my suspicions were that the new administration would take some time to assess what they had in inherited.
“Those involved in the negotiations from Westminster and Karen Betts at the SWA have played a blinder and they have done an exceptional job for the industry.
“The US market will always be a key and influential market for The GlenAllachie and for the wider Scotch whisky industry.
"The confusion related to tariffs did slow down our progress in the USA, so we are looking forward to getting on with business.”
READ MORE: Scottish communities 'will be destroyed' by crippling Trump whisky tariffs
GMB Scotland, which has been lobbying along with US trade unions to end the tariff dispute, welcomed the announcement.
Gary Smith, General Secretary, said: "This is welcome news for Scotland and workers across our whisky and spirits sector, but amid the political backslapping, government and industry should pay tribute to the efforts of those workers on both sides of the Atlantic who fought long and hard to stop these tariffs.
“It should be a moment of reflection for the UK Government, not celebration. The economic damage has been done and livelihoods have been lost because Ministers failed to recognise the importance of this industry to Scotland and Britain from the outset of this tariffs war.
“The lessons need to be learned because whisky and spirits manufacturing is essential to the prosperity of the Scottish economy and it will be a cornerstone of Britain’s post-COVID recovery – it’s that important.
“Moving forward, Ministers must understand we won’t accept anything less than a trade deal with the US that protects and grows production and jobs, and the industry must understand that we will expect proper value for the workers who will deliver that future.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel