JOHN Swinney is expected to survive a vote of no confidence in Holyrood tomorrow despite claims he has "abused his power to cover up crucial evidence" in the Alex Salmond saga.
The Deputy First Minister has come under pressure over the release of legal advice relating to Mr Salmond's judicial review against the Scottish Government.
But the no confidence vote, which has been lodged by the Scottish Conservatives, is unlikely to succeed as the Greens have made clear they will not back it.
The party's co-leader Patrick Harvie accused the Conservatives of playing a "pathetic political game just weeks ahead of an election".
The Tories first tabled their no confidence threat two weeks ago, forcing Mr Swinney to release the Government's legal advice relating to Mr Salmond's judicial review.
Mr Swinney acted after it became clear opposition parties would back the Tory motion.
MSPs had twice voted for the legal advice to be released.
A Holyrood inquiry is looking into how the Government botched its probe into sexual misconduct allegations made against Mr Salmond in 2018.
Mr Salmond had the exercise set aside in a judicial review after the Government conceded it was unlawful and “tainted by apparent bias”, an error that left taxpayers with a £512,000 bill for his legal costs.
He was later cleared of multiple charges of sexual assault at the High Court in Edinburgh.
Mr Swinney faced a vote of no confidence last year following the exam results debacle, but survived as a result of support from the Greens.
Tomorrow's vote has been scheduled for 2.50pm.
Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said: "The Scottish Greens will always defend the integrity of the Scottish Parliament, and that is why we backed the call for John Swinney to release evidence that the harassment committee and parliament had asked for.
"That evidence clearly showed the Scottish Government had failed the women who came forward, and this, rather than opportunistic political theatre, should be the focus.
"The Tories called it a screeching U-turn last week, but this week they still want a political scalp to show for it.
"The evidence provided cannot be both the bombshell revelation they claimed, and at the same time inadequate to draw conclusions on the issues that matter."
Mr Harvie added: "It's clear from this naked attempt to undermine our democratic institutions, and from the line of questioning from their committee members, that the Scottish Conservatives have no interest in making sure women are supported coming forward with complaints in the future.
"For them, this vote of no confidence is a pathetic political game just weeks ahead of an election in which they have nothing positive to offer the people of Scotland."
Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross said: "Any time John Swinney is in trouble, the Greens set aside all principles and ride to his rescue.
"The Greens have shown again that they will let the SNP away with anything, even ignoring votes of the Scottish Parliament.
"Their cause always comes first – and that’s independence, not the environment. Their true colours are not green, they are SNP yellow.
"Patrick Harvie is back in his happy place - Nicola Sturgeon’s pocket. The Greens have shown they are too weak to stand up to the SNP and support the position they already set out in two votes of the Scottish Parliament."
“The case for the vote of no confidence in John Swinney is clear to any impartial observer.
"We can no longer trust him to do the right thing. He has abused his power to cover up crucial evidence."
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie indicated his party will vote in favour of the motion.
It came as members of the Holyrood inquiry said they were "extremely frustrated" at Government delays in handing over evidence.
The committee also said it is "not reassured it has received all relevant information".
It was responding to a letter from Mr Swinney in which he confirmed minutes of meetings between Nicola Sturgeon, Permanent Secretary Leslie Evans and the Scottish Government's legal counsel could not be found.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel