AN outgoing SNP MSP has urged Nicola Sturgeon to work with Alex Salmond’s Alba Party – warning there has been “zero progress in the last five years” in pushing forward the independence cause.
Alex Neil, who is not seeking re-election next month for his Airdrie and Shotts seat, has stressed to the independence movement that Holyrood needs to return a supermajority in order to “force Boris Johnson’s hand” to agree to another independence referendum.
Mr Neil served as Health Secretary under Mr Salmond when he was first minister.
His remarks come just one day after the SNP’s election manfiesto set out that a “simple majority” of MSPs in Holyrood, as was the case in the last term of parliament, would be a mandate for a re-run of the 2014 poll to be held.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon admits SNP's economic plan for independence now 'completely out of date'
Mr Neil said: “Since 2016 the SNP and Scottish Green Party have, between them, had a pro-independence overall majority of nine in the Scottish Parliament.
“Despite that there has been zero progress during the past five years in bringing about a second independence referendum. We cannot allow that situation to continue for another five years.
“The experience of the last five years teaches us that a supermajority of pro-independence MSPs will be needed to force Boris Johnson’s hand on the constitutional question.”
He added: “Unfortunately, under the current system for electing the Scottish Parliament, there is no realistic possibility of any one party winning such a supermajority by itself.
“To achieve a supermajority requires all the pro-independence parties working in partnership together.”
Mr Neil has not said he will leave the SNP and join Alba, in the same way as other high-profile members including MPs Kenny MacAskill and Neale Hanvey, but he has called for the two parties to put “self interests” and “personalities” aside.
READ MORE: SNP drops Indyref2 slogan from ballot papers
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has repeatedly insisted she will not work with Mr Salmond and his new project, but the former first minister has left the door open for a shared platform.
Mr Neil added: “The SNP is the leading driver for constitutional change in Scotland, but to achieve our primary objective we must be big enough to work with others who are on our side.
“In this election, it is clear in nearly every region of Scotland the SNP’s huge sway over such a large number of constituency seats means that it is impossible for it to win many list seats under the current system for electing regional MSPs.
“In such circumstances it makes sense to have an agreement between the pro-independence parties to vote tactically to maximise the pro-independence vote.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon rejects 'arm-wrestling competition' over who is most pro-Yes
“Electing a supermajority of pro-independence MSPs must surely be preferable to allowing anti-independence MSPs to get in by default because the pro-independence parties haven’t supported each other.
“We must all put our country, Scotland, first.”
A spokeswoman for the SNP said: “It’s clear that only an SNP Government can deliver an independence referendum and give people in Scotland a choice on the country’s future, once the crisis of Covid has passed.
“The only safe way to ensure that Nicola Sturgeon is re-elected as First Minister and that Scotland’s future lies in Scotland’s hands – not Boris Johnson’s – is to give both votes to the SNP on May 6.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel