COUNCIL leaders in Edinburgh have set out proposals to invest an extra £8.5 million into public services – with plans drawn up to support social care and repair potholes.
The city’s SNP-Labour minority coalition will bring forward the plans for approval next month.
Edinburgh Conservatives have labelled the announcement “too little too late” and accused the coalition of a “cynical attempt” so close to the election “to influence the public”.
The proposals include an extra £2.5 million to help support social care services and £6 million to improve roads and pavements, including £2 million to repair potholes and £4 million to resurface roads and pavements.
Last week, the council leadership announced £450,000 plans to open temporary public toilets across the capital including at the Meadows and Portobello after a spate of anti-social behaviour. The council has previously closed a host of public toilets.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Council aims to build north-south tram line by 2030
The council administration’s budget, which was approved in February, committed to investigating additional spending to deal with the winter impact on roads and provide extra investment for health and social care once the Scottish and UK budgets had been passed and funding deals finalised.
Discussions will take place with opposition parties over any further investment with a report drawn up by officials for the authority’s finance and resources committee on May 20.
SNP council leader Adam McVey said: “This winter weather has had a major impact on the surface of our roads so we’re proposing to spend £6 million on roads and pavements, in addition to our existing £100 million roads investment programme.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Sunday parking charges to begin in city centre
“We’ve been listening carefully to what our residents are telling us and prioritising their local needs. We hope they will see a real difference from this investment and everyone will benefit from an improved condition, particularly vulnerable road users and pedestrians.”
He added: “We’ll have further cross-party discussions in the coming days and weeks to inform the council’s spending plans, which will be approved in May.
“We’re determined to make sure additional investments benefit the people of Edinburgh now, who have shown enormous perseverance through the pandemic, while helping us build the future Capital City our residents want.”
READ MORE: Watch: Edinburgh Council's £32m car-free plans for George Street
Iain Whyte, Conservative group leader at the city council, warned over a lack of detailed plans he claimed could put the funding at risk of being wasted.
He said: “As with most things from this SNP-Labour run council this announcement is too little too late.
“Also, without a real plan to implement change it runs the risk of being wasted spending.
“The Conservative budget we presented back in February proposed extra funding for road and pavement repairs and health and social care.
“Importantly, it tied that funding to action to transform the services getting more value for money on pothole repairs and new and efficient ways of working on social care.”
Mr Whyte added: “The funding for public toilets is welcome but won’t be enough for all the sites involved and needs to be backed up with a plan to enforce park rules and ensure more is done in partnership with the police on anti-social behaviour.
“We called for this last summer and the SNP still haven’t caught up showing they really don’t understand the need to make our parks safe and pleasant places for everyone as we approach a summer where most social interaction will still be outdoors.”
Mr Whyte also accused council leaders of “ignoring” election rules.
He said: “What’s probably most worrying is the timing of this announcement so close to an election suggesting a cynical attempt by the SNP Council to influence the public.
“It begs serious questions when it was the SNP who suggested earlier in the year that they wanted to limit democracy by curtailing the number of council meetings during the parliamentary purdah period.
“Now the election is here they are ignoring purdah and making major announcements without any advance reference to committee or public scrutiny.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel