WILL Scotland choose a handsome hunk? Will its lucky number be one, two or three?
Let's hear some introductions... what's your name and where do you come from?
"My name's Gordon, and I'm from Giffnock. My big heart beats for unity. Unless you're from Rochdale, in which case you bigoted women are on your own.
"Pick me... or don't, you'll still be stuck with me. I may be a penitent sinner, but rest assured I'll minister to your every need."
Number two, what's your name and where do you come from?
"My name's Michael, and I'm from Aberdeen. I might have been an architect of Brexit, but that's the only split I'll permit.
"I want to keep us together. You don't need to know the how, the why or the wherefore - I'm sick of experts.
"I may, on occasion, take a drive to test my eyesight but when it comes to us, I'll be driving you nothing but wild."
Number three - what's your name and where do you come from?
"My name's Boris, and I'm from Manhattan. I like Greek, late night cheese, and fall asleep by counting my children.
"I don't have much money but if you want to come to my love nest, I've got a chaise longue for you to lounge on."
Would that the Westminster efforts to wine and dine Scotland couldn't be resolved in a 30 minute game show.
Instead, it's been threatened that Boris Johnson plans to love bomb North Britain over the next 18 months. Luckily it seems likely the Scottish Government will ease the overseas travel ban shortly so we're not entirely trapped with the man.
You'll remember that last year he said the government was "putting our arms around every single worker". He's really not listening to the mood music, is he? Keep your hands to yourself, Johnson.
But the blond Lothario is nowhere to be seen. Afraid to be the prime minister who loses Scotland, he's choosing to love us from afar while sending an emissary in his place.
And what better emissary than Michael Gove, apparently roaming up and down Buchanan street asking ordinary Scots their thoughts on independence. He did a decent number on BBC Scotland's Sunday Show, dodging every one of Martin Geissler's questions with a stock answer and looking for all the world like a glass frog waiting to lick up a cricket.
Labour are at it too, sending Gordon Brown to try to romance his countrymen. But at least they avoid the dreaded "love bomb" phrase.
Love bomb suggests a violent affection. It's also a name for a form of coercive control and was first coined to describe the technique used by the Moonies to convert followers so I'm not just being picky - it's really not a great sell, political tactic-wise. It's one of these soundbites that deserves to bite the dust.
Another one of these phrases is "divisive referendum". How many time over the past few days has been uttered the phrase "We do not need another divisive referendum." What's a uniting referendum? It's almost tautology, this self-fulfilling scaremongering.
Instead of faux concern about division, why not focus on how to make a referendum campaign a civil experience? Those who bleat about the perils of another independence vote seem relaxed about elections.
One guarantee, as we stride off into a future that may or may not contain a second indy ref, is that there's going to be a entire lexicon of meaningless phraseology. Annoying shorthands that try to encapsulate complicated and nuanced issues into a two or three word fit-for-Twitter terms.
Politicians will be at it, pundits will be at it. Alarm clock Britain, remember that, courtesy of Nick Clegg? Theresa May's JAM electorate - just about managing.
Love bombs, divisive referendums. A lot of "why do you hate Scotlands". An overwhelming number of questions dodged.
And now, from the Tories, an uncomfortable undercurrent that all this is in the name of love, like a creepy ex who insists he can win you back by force of will alone. He's done nothing to improve his bad habits yet he can't think why you don't want him.
No thanks to the love bomb. I do not consent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel