School pupils across Scotland have been warned against sharing details of assessments on their social media.
In a letter from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) sent to schools on Monday, director of qualifications development Dr Gill Stewart said they had been made aware of “very serious incidents” of assessments being shared.
The letter goes on to say “appropriate penalties” should be applied to pupils in breach of exam rules, but these should be used by individual schools and not by the SQA.
The letter said the SQA provided “optional secure assessment materials” for schools to use, but given the extra flexibility afforded to teachers and schools this year, pupils across the country are sitting exams at different times, meaning questions could be leaked.
As a result of coronavirus, the exams in Scotland were cancelled and replaced with internal assessments, but critics have claimed these are exams by another name.
The Times Educational Supplement Scotland reported on Monday of an “SQA black market” on the social media site TikTok, with pupils “begging” for questions to be shared before they sit their assessment.
The letter said: “SQA has been made aware of very serious incidents involving candidates sharing confidential assessment content on social media.
“We are taking this matter very seriously and have contacted the centres to ensure that the posts are removed as soon as possible, and that any candidate malpractice concerns are managed locally within the centres.”
Dr Stewart added: “Learners should all be reminded that they must not discuss or share the content of assessment materials.
“If you become aware of a candidate malpractice concern, your own centre’s malpractice procedures are to be applied as quickly as possible to contain any potential security breaches.
“If the malpractice investigation finds that there has been candidate malpractice, then appropriate penalties should be applied.”
The letter concluded: “Maintaining the confidentiality of these assessment materials is critical to the credibility of the alternative certification model.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel