FOUSTIE
IT’S World Whisky Day and I’ve just had a belated Christmas treat. A brief moment of light amidst the darkness of lockdown, my wife had arranged a virtual whisky-tasting at a local distillery, admirably hosted by an ambassador and her assistant. I learned many things, not least from other participants. Have you encountered the Icelandic whisky where barley-smoking is undertaken using sheep-dung? Looking forward to trying that one!
The ambassador used today’s word, since not every whisky-making process is entirely sweet-smelling. Foustie (there are various spellings), according to the Dictionaries of the Scots Language (www.dsl.ac.uk), is an adjective related to foost “smell mouldy”/”mouldy condition”. The words derive originally from the Old French fust “wine-barrel”, but meanings involving noxious odours quickly emerged in both Scots and English. Dr Johnson’s English Dictionary (1755) defined fust as “a strong smell, as of a mouldy barrel”, and an Edinburgh will from 1632 flags an obviously unwelcome legacy: “Tua pund … of auld fuistit tabacco”.
DSL records several fascinating citations for foustie and related words. John Young’s Lays from the Poorhouse, a Glasgow temperance poetry collection from 1860, offers a grim one: “Tho’ lang he’s lain mould’rin in death’s foustie biel” (shelter). The anonymous but equally grim Deil’s Hallowe’en of 1856 tells us how “Auld Satan swore, with foostin breath, He’d haud the nicht as sure as death”. And there are extended meanings as well. In 1900, it seems, the verb foust meant - in Aberdeen - to hoard up money, while in 1920s Roxburghshire a fuist was a generalised “odd or eccentric person”. In nineteenth-century Banffshire the word had an even more specialised meaning: “to break wind in a suppressed manner”. Perhaps there was a sheep-dung connection.
Scots Word of the Week is written by Jeremy Smith, Professor of English Philology in the University of Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here