Scotland’s courts experienced widespread delays on Monday as defence lawyers took action in a dispute over support for legal aid firms struggling due to the pandemic.
Solicitors said to be “at breaking point” boycotted courts across the country in a move designed to delay the processing of custody cases – the stage where an accused makes their first appearance after being arrested.
The action came as it was revealed that a Scottish Government fund set up to help law firms in the wake of a downturn in court work has paid out just £2.3 million of its allocated £9m.
A £1m traineeship fund is also yet to be implemented despite being announced months ago.
The Scottish Government said it was working to explore other options to ensure the resilience fund is fully distributed.
However, Julia McPartlin, president of the newly set up Scottish Solicitors Bar Association (SSBA), argued that it should not take months for an emergency fund to be issued.
The SSBA said in a statement: “Our firms urgently need support to continue practising whilst the pandemic is ongoing.
“The Scottish Government recognised this reality by assigning £9 million to a resilience fund for practitioners but there has been a complete failure to properly distribute that fund to firms who desperately need it.”
It added: “The profession is at breaking point. Firms must be supported now to ensure we maintain a healthy and vibrant legal aid profession. This is fundamental to access to justice.
“The most vulnerable in society and, indeed, justice itself will continue to suffer if the legal aid profession is not supported. We call on the Scottish Government to take urgent action to distribute the resilience fund.”
Figures obtained under freedom of information laws suggest that legal aid payouts for solicitors dropped from £95.6m in 2019/20 to £74.1m last year, largely due to the shutdown of the courts during the pandemic.
The Scottish Legal Aid Board (SLAB) said it is expecting a jump in payouts this year as the justice system begins to recover, however lawyers claim some firms might not last much longer without financial support.
The resilience fund was welcomed by the profession when it was announced late last year, however this quickly turned to anger as many were refused an award. Of the 288 firms who applied for financial help, just 93 received a grant.
More than 20 legal bar associations decided to take action on Monday in protest, including at Glasgow and Edinburgh Sheriff Courts and other areas including Ayr, Kilmarnock and Aberdeen.
The courts affected saw a representative from their association deal with all custody cases, resulting in the delays.
At Glasgow Sheriff Court, the courts had to sit until 10.30pm despite lawyers saying they were surprised at the low number of custody cases - just 38 compared to 56 last Monday - especially given the scenes in the city centre following Rangers FC’s Scottish Premiership trophy presentation.
Fiona McKinnon, president of the Glasgow Bar Association, said: “We’re not as busy as we expected to be given the scenes over the weekend in Glasgow. I’m surprised that the numbers are as low.”
Police said they made 28 arrests in connection with the crowds on Saturday.
A Scottish Government spokesman said: “As well as delivering the first stage of an uplift to legal aid fees of more than 10% over the next two years, the Scottish Government launched a resilience fund to support legal aid solicitors. We received 288 applications – representing fewer than half of the potentially eligible active firms - and have offered awards totalling circa £2.3 million. We are fully committed to providing support to the profession and are working as a matter of urgency to explore options for distributing all unallocated funds from the £9 million budget set aside for the resilience fund.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel