It is one way of getting in touch with the ancestors, though perhaps a bit more ghoulish than simply researching a family tree.
Experts at the University of Glasgow is to embark on an investigation of a modern-day phenomenon which has seen a rise in the number of people wishing to be buried like their prehistoric forebears.
The new trend has seen modern versions of prehistoric burial mounds called barrows being built to contain the cremation ashes of the deceased.
There are now over ten of these buildings in operation or in the planning process across the UK, each with design elements taken from megalithic burial mounds from the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods.
READ MORE: Archaeologists find mysterious ancient iron dagger during excevations
The first was at The Long Barrow at All Cannings, Wiltshire, in 2014, built by Tim Daw, and since then several barrows have been built by Sacred Stones and other private owners.
Several are now in the planning process in Wales and in Kinghorn, Fife and near Perth in Scotland. These are all very popular and meet a growing demand for alternative, sustainable forms of burial.
A Cairn near Inverness
Barrows, sometimes described as tumuli on early maps, are mounds of earth or stone (often called cairns) of various shapes and sizes which are characteristic earthwork monuments of the prehistoric periods from about 5,800 until 3,400 years ago (3800-1400 BC).
Less intensive and intermittent construction and use of barrow mounds also occurred in later times up until about 1,200 years ago (AD 800).
Among the most famous barrow mound in the UK is the ship burial discovered at Sutton Hoo in 1939, a story recently re-told in the film The Dig.
The chambered cairn In Orkney, Mses Howe, is another well-preserved example of neolithic burial practices.
Archaeologist Dr Kenny Brophy and researcher Andrew Watson have received a British Academy Leverhulme small grant to undertake research.
The new project - Death BC - is the first in-depth archaeological evaluation of this phenomenon. Through research, fieldwork, and interviews, the research team will explore to what extent prehistory has influenced these barrow columbaria, and why people choose to store their own or family member's remains within them.
The Sutton Hoo mound contained an Anglow Saxon ship burial
The team will also look at what can barrow columbaria tell us about approaches to death and burial today, and to what extent do prehistoric monuments and practices still influence our lives.
The relevance of prehistoric lifeways in society today is one element of the University of Glasgow archaeology department’s engaged archaeology strand of research.
Dr Brophy said: “I am excited that the British Academy have agreed to fund this research and grateful for builders, owners and users of barrow columbaria for being willing to collaborate with us. The construction of prehistoric-style monuments appears to be more fashionable now than it has been for millennia and I want to make sense of why this might be.
“An archaeological perspective to the study of these barrows is relevant not just because of the prehistoric connections, but also because we are interested in how people interact with buildings and material culture in relation to death and burial in any time period”.
READ MORE: Threave Garden find dated to dated to between 8,000 BC
Researcher Andrew Watson added: “Death BC is the first project of its kind and builds on my doctoral research with Dr Brophy. This project will allow us to advance this research further, exploring the significance of these monuments not only to people interring loved ones but wider society.
"We also hope to be able to explore contemporary perspectives on death, burial, mourning and remembrance through these monuments and the communities associated with them”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here