The European Union is taking on vaccine producer AstraZeneca in a Brussels court, accusing the drugmaker of acting in bad faith to provide jabs to other nations when it had promised them for delivery among the 27 member states.
The bloc accused the Anglo-Swedish company of pushing EU deliveries back so it could service the UK among others.
AstraZeneca's contract signed with the European Commission on behalf of member states foresaw an initial 300 million doses for distribution among all 27 countries, with an option for a further 100 million.
READ MORE: European Commission launches legal action against AstraZeneca over vaccine contract
The doses were expected to be delivered throughout 2021, but only 30 million were sent during the first quarter.
Deliveries have increased slightly since then but, according to the commission, the company is set to provide only 70 million doses in the second quarter. It had promised 180 million.
EU lawyer Rafael Jafferali told the court the company expects to deliver the total number of doses by the end of December, but he added that "with a six-month delay, it's obviously a failure".
He asked the court to impose a fine of 10 million euros (£8.6 million) per infraction to the company, and to force AstraZeneca to pay 10 euros per dose for each day of delay as compensation for breaching the EU contract.
His main argument is that AstraZeneca should have used production sites in the bloc and the UK for EU supplies as part of a "best reasonable effort" clause in the contract, adding that the European Commission had agreed to pay 870 million euros (£750 million) for the jabs.
READ MORE: Coronavirus Scotland: 546 new Covid cases in 24 hours and no new deaths
He said 50 million doses that should have been delivered to the EU went to third countries instead, "in violation" of the contract.
Charles-Edouard Lambert, another lawyer on the EU team, said AstraZeneca decided to reserve production at its Oxford site for Britain.
"This is utterly serious. AstraZeneca did not use all the means at its disposal. There is a double standard in the way it treats the UK and member states," he said.
The EU also accused the company of misleading the European Commission by providing data lacking clarity on the delivery delays.
"The information provided by AstraZeneca did not allow us to fully understand the situation before mid-March 2021," Mr Jafferali said.
The EU has insisted its complaints are about deliveries only and has repeatedly said it has no problems with the safety or quality of the vaccine. The jabs have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, the EU's drug regulator.
While the bloc insists AstraZeneca breached its contractual obligations, the company says it has fully complied with the agreement, arguing that vaccines are difficult to manufacture and it made its best effort to deliver on time.
A lawyer representing AstraZeneca, Hakim Boularbah, said the company's May 2020 agreement with the UK Government and Oxford University to supply 100 million doses of vaccine at cost clearly gave priority to Britain.
"It's very shocking to be accused of fraud," he said, calling it "a groundless accusation".
"More or less 60 million doses from the order have been delivered," Mr Boularbah said, adding that AstraZeneca does everything it can to increase production and will deliver the 300 million doses as soon as possible.
As part of an advanced purchase agreement with vaccine companies, the EU said it invested 2.7 billion euros (£2.3 billion), including 336 million euros (£290 million) to finance the production of AstraZeneca's serum at four factories.
The long-standing dispute drew media attention for weeks earlier this year amid a deadly surge of coronavirus infections in Europe, when delays in vaccine production and deliveries hampered the EU's vaccination campaign.
Cheaper and easier to use than a rival jab from Pfizer-BioNTech, the AstraZeneca vaccine developed with Oxford University was a pillar of the EU's vaccine rollout, but the EU's partnership with the firm quickly deteriorated amid accusations it favoured its relationship with British authorities.
While the UK made quick progress in its vaccination campaign thanks to the AstraZeneca jabs, the EU faced embarrassing complaints and criticism for its slow start.
Concerns over the pace of the rollout across the EU grew after AstraZeneca said it could not supply EU members with as many doses as originally expected because of production capacity limits.
In total, the European Commission has secured more than 2.5 billion of vaccine doses with various manufacturers, but is now shying away from further orders with AstraZeneca.
It recently sealed another major order with Pfizer and BioNTech until 2023 for an additional 1.8 billion doses of their jab to share between the bloc's countries.
A judgment in the case is to be delivered at a later date.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel