The new Justice Secretary has said there is a “very strong case” for abolishing Scotland’s controversial not proven verdict.
However, Keith Brown stressed that there are “complex issues” involving the verdict – which is not used in other parts of the UK – and these need to be carefully considered.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has previously said it is time to look at whether Scotland retains not proven, as part of efforts to tackle the “shamefully low” conviction rates for rape and sexual assault.
The SNP manifesto for May’s Holyrood election committed the party to consulting on its abolition.
Mr Brown, who took on the justice brief after the election, said it is “fairly plain that amongst the various parties in this chamber there are different views” on the issue of not proven.
He said it is right that a proper consultation is carried out, adding there would be “implications for other parts of the justice system” if the verdict is scrapped.
Mr Brown stated: “We do recognise there is a very strong case that has been made for its abolition, but there are complex issues.
“And while I know many in the chamber support the move, it is right that we consider this very carefully.”
As part of reforms that ministers hope will create a “faster, fairer and more effective justice system”, Mr Brown said the Scottish Government will appoint a Victims Commissioner to “provide an independent voice for victims”.
He also vowed “changes to ensure lifelong anonymity for complainers of sexual crimes”, saying this would further increase the confidence of victims to report such attacks.
Conservative justice spokesman Jamie Greene said the SNP’s proposed reforms are “not going far enough and nor are they going fast enough”.
He said his party wants to see sentences doubled for those who commit crimes against emergency service workers, saying pleas for this have “largely fallen on deaf ears in recent years”.
He argued: “It is only right that those who go out of their way to harm our frontline personnel are punished accordingly.”
Mr Greene also pledged the Tories would bring a Victims’ Bill to Holyrood, saying this would “contain a number of very specific actions that I think the Government can take right now to truly shift the balance”.
The Conservatives want to introduce Suzanne’s Law – named after Suzanne Pilley.
This would include Michelle’s Law, named after murdered teenager Michelle Stewart, allowing for families’ and victims’ views to be taken into account when decisions on the early release of prisoners on parole are being made.
The Conservative Bill would also seek to bring in Suzanne’s Law, named after Edinburgh book-keeper Suzanne Pilley, whose killer has never revealed the whereabouts of her body.
This change would mean parole would be denied to murderers if they refuse to say where they have hidden their victim’s remains.
Labour justice spokesman Pauline McNeill welcomed the move to ensure the victims of sexual assaults remain anonymous.
“Many people think this is the case already, but it is not,” she said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel