Facebook prematurely turned off safeguards designed to thwart misinformation after Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in last year's elections in a moneymaking move, a whistleblower claims.
The whistleblower, former Facebook product manager Frances Haugen, said this contributed to the invasion of the US Capitol on January 6.
She also asserted during an exclusive interview that aired Sunday on CBS' 60 Minutes that a 2018 change to the content flow in Facebook's news feeds contributed to more divisiveness and ill will in a network ostensibly created to bring people closer together.
Despite the enmity that the new algorithms were feeding, Facebook found that they helped keep people coming back - a pattern that helped the Menlo Park, California, company sell more of the digital ads that generate most of its advertising.
She said: "The thing I saw at Facebook over and over again was there were conflicts of interest between what was good for the public and what was good for Facebook.
"And Facebook, over and over again, chose to optimise for its own interests, like making more money."
Facebook's annual revenue has more than doubled from 56 billion dollars (£41.4 billion) in 2018 to a projected 119 billion (£88 billion) this year, based on the estimates of analysts surveyed by FactSet.
Meanwhile, the company's market value has soared from 375 billion dollars (£275 billion) at the end of 2018 to nearly 1 trillion dollars (£750 billion) now.
Even before the full interview came out, a top Facebook executive was deriding the whistleblower's allegations as "misleading".
Nick Clegg, the company's vice president of policy and public affairs wrote to Facebook employees in a memo sent on Friday, saying: "Social media has had a big impact on society in recent years, and Facebook is often a place where much of this debate plays out.
"But what evidence there is simply does not support the idea that Facebook, or social media more generally, is the primary cause of polarisation."
The 60 Minutes interview intensifies the spotlight already glaring on Facebook as politicians and regulators around the world scrutinise the social network's immense power to shape opinions and its polarising effects on society.
The backlash has been intensifying since The Wall Street Journal's mid-September publication of an expose that revealed Facebook's own internal research had concluded the social network's attention-seeking algorithms had helped foster political dissent and contributed to mental health and emotional problems among teenagers, especially girls.
After copying thousands of pages of Facebook's internal research, Ms Haugen leaked them to the Journal to provide the foundation for a succession of stories packaged as the Facebook Files.
Although Facebook asserted the Journal had cherry picked the most damaging information in the internal documents to cast the company in the worst possible light, the revelations prompted an indefinite delay in the rollout of a kids version of its popular app Instagram.
During the interview, Ms Haugen said: "No-one at Facebook is malevolent.
"But the incentives are misaligned, right? Like, Facebook makes more money when you consume more content.
"People enjoy engaging with things that elicit an emotional reaction. And the more anger that they get exposed to, the more they interact and the more they consume."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel